Home Maxims & Terms Supplemental proceedings meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Supplemental proceedings

Supplemental proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 YLR 575 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S. 42Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss.94 & 115Suit for declarationSupplemental proceedingsFurnishing of bondScopeRevisionMaintainabilityPlaintiff filed suit wherein he moved an application under S.94, C.P.C. that defendants were violating the stay orderTrial Court directed the defendants to submit personal bondsValidity

Nothing was wrong if the Trial Court passed interlocutory order when mala fides were alleged in the plaint and court observed the same as just, proper and convenient

No illegality or irregularity had been committed by the Trial Court and impugned order had been passed in legal fashion

Revision was not entertainable before the High Court in circumstances, and same should have been filed before the court of District Judge as being the court of lowest grade.

2015 YLR 575 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
S. 94Supplemental proceedingsPower of court to pass interlocutory orderScope

Making of interim order was a part of the working of the judicial system and no separate or specific provision was necessary.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Supplemental proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953685

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Supplemental proceedings"

PLD 2023
2023-January-4

P L D 2023 Supreme Court 209

NAEEM TAHIR and others — Petitioners Versus JAHAN SHAH alias SHAH JEHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1963
Civil Revision No. 610 of 1962, decided on 2nd April 1963.

P L D 1963 (W

AMANULLAH KHAN AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus KHURSHID AHMAD‑Respondent

Court: S. 11, Explanation VII as introduced by S. 5, Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance (XLIV of 1962)‑"Proceeding"‑Meaning‑Word does not include supplemental proceedings.
YLR 2015
Revision Petition No.9 of 2012, decided on 21st March, 2013.

2015 Y L R 575

Ch. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS ARVI — Petitioner Versus KHALIDA BIBI and another — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1958
Civil Revision Petition No. 150 of 1957, decided on 13th November 1957 of the order of Ata Ullah, Qureshi, District Judge, Multan, dated the 14th May, 1957, affirming that of Abdul Hayee, Civil Judge, Multan, dated the 10th April, 1957.

P L D 1958 (W

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD and 28 others‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2000
Civil Revision No.722 of 1999, decided on 6th July, 1999.

2000,M L D 729

SAHIB KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1998
1997-August-25

1998 C L C 134

HOECHST PAKISTAN LTD. and others‑‑‑Applicants Versus MAQBOOL AHMED and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2016
2015-September-15

P L D 2016 High Court (AJ&K) 1

Chief Coordinator and another — Petitioners Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL through Chairman and 7 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1993
C.MA. No. 4802‑3/90 (in Suit No. 926 of 1990), decided on 19th February, 1991.

1993 C L C 605

Miss QAMAR ALI ‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus Syed NADIR ALI and others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 2023
2022-May-18

2023 C L C 731

Dr. AMJAD ALI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)
PLC(CS) 2019
Suit No.419 and C.M.A. No.3305 of 2019, decided on 23rd April, 2019.

2019 P L C (C

MS. SERWAT AZIM Versus SINDH BANK LIMITED through President/CEO and 7 others

Court: Sindh High Court