Home Maxims & Terms Mining concession meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Mining concession

Mining concession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 YLR 719 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionMining concessionProspecting license, grant ofNew policy, introduction ofRetrospective effectGood governance, equity and fair play, principles ofScope

Petitioner applied for grant of prospecting license and before issuance of the same new policy was introduced and petitioner was directed to reduce the applied area according to the new policy

Validity

Petitioner filed the requisite application prior to the new policy which was kept pending by the department

Petitioner was not on fault in the present case

Public functionaries were required to act with the principles of good governance, equity and fair play

Policy formulated subsequently would not operate retrospectively

Subsequent change could not be made applicable retrospectively, adversely, affecting the rights of any individual

Petitioner had spent an amount to discover the applied mineral and due to mala fides on the part of respondent-department he was struggling for more than six years to get the prospecting license which was his right

Petitioner was being penalized on the inaction of department-respondents

Constitutional petition was accepted in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Mining concession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124953689

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Mining concession"

SCMR 1982
Criminal Petition No. 61-R of 1979, decided on 3rd May, 1980.

1982 S C M R 345

Haji FAZAL-I-MANAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: -- Read with N.-W. F. P. Mining Concession Rules, 1976-West Pakistan Regulation of Mines and Minerals Development Act, 1958 Not ultra vires power of Provincial Legislature-N.-W. F. P. Mining Concession Rules, 1976-Applicable to Mangora District, Swat arguments relating to appreciation of evidence and three Courts below having recorded concurrent findings of fact and such findings not suffering from any infirmity, legal or otherwise, leave to appeal refused.-Vires of legislation-Evidence.
CLD 2011
2010-July-23

2011 C L D 507

Messrs NASIR NAWAZ through Muhammad Bukhsh — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT DIRETOR, MINES AND MINERAL and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2011
2010-July-23

P L D 2011 Lahore 172

Messrs NASIR NAWAZ and Co. through Muhammad Bukhsh — Petitioner Versus ASSISTAN DIRECTOR, MINES AND MINERAL and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1973
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 150 of 1973, decided on 26th April 1973.

1973 S C M R 277

MUHAMMAD IJAZ AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF MINERAL

Court: High Court
YLR 2000
Writ Petition No. 16031 of 1998, decided on 13th January, 2000.

2000 Y L R 1234

Chief Executive‑‑‑Petitioner Versus APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENT/

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeals Nos. 64 of 1991 and 341 of 1992, decided on 27th January, 1993.

1993 S C M R 1140

MAKERWAL COLLIERIES Ltd. and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. and 11 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2020
2019-May-22

P L D 2020 Sindh 99

PAKISTAN MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION through Project Director — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Energy Department and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLCN 2018
N/A

2018 C L C Note 8

Syed MUHAMMAD SAGHEER SHAH — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT, D.G. KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1959
Suit No. 469 of 1954, decided on 22nd December 1958.

P L D 1959 (W

MESSRS M. ESMAILJEE & SONS‑Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑Defendant

Court:
YLR 2011
Writ Petition No. 3843 of 2010, decided on 1st November, 2010.

2011 YLR 186

ILYAS ALI — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY MINES AND MINERALS PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore