Home Maxims & Terms Legislative instrument meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Legislative instrument

Legislative instrument legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2020 CLD 310 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 25State Bank of Pakistan Act (XXXIII of 1956), PreambleState Bank of Pakistan CircularsLegislative instrumentScope

Circulars of State Bank of Pakistan are notifications having been issued under powers derived from State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956/Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962 and have force of law

Circulars of State Bank of Pakistan cannot be termed as Legislative instruments of the nature which can curtail accrued/being accrued 'vested rights' if available under law.

2015 PLD 69 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 199High CourtJudicial review, power ofScopeLegislative instrument

While exercising the power of judicial review, the court was hardly concerned with good or bad aspects of the legislative instrument rather the prime, paramount and pivotal consideration (of the court) was the constitutionality of the statute

Court had to ensure and remain satisfied that any of the provisions of the enactment was not violative of the Constitution.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Legislative instrument", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954127

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legislative instrument"

SCMR 1992
Civil Review Petitions Nos. 4-K and 5-K of 1983, decided on 29th April, 1992.

1992 S C M R 1496

SHAMIM-UR-RAHMAN — Petitioner Versus FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1988
Writ Petition No. 1686, decided on 14th December, 1987.

P L D 1988 Lahore 171

Malik NAZAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 199‑‑Constitutional petition‑‑Judicial review of legislative instruments‑‑Legislative instruments, held, could not be permitted to be challenged on ground of mala fides‑‑Legal justification for issuing legislative instruments was a matter solely within competence of legislature or law‑giver which could not be judicially reviewed. ‑‑Mala fide.
PLD 2010
2010-April-12

P L D 2010 Karachi 236

Mst. UMMATULLAH through Attorney — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Town Planning, Karachi and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS)N 2017
Writ Petition No.54-P of 2015, decided on 8th December, 2015.

2017 P L C (C

Dr. MUNIR KHAN KHATTAK Versus CHANCELLOR, THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and 4 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLD 1983
its own facts and no hard and fast rule can be laid down

P L D 1983 Supreme Court 457

FAUJI FOUNDATION AND ANOTHER-Appellants Versus SHAMIMUR REHMAN-Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1999
Civil Petitions Nos. 155‑L, 457 and 458 of 1999, decided on 25th March, 1999.

1999 S C M R 1229

Islamabad and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus SHAUKAT ALI MIAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2000
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 62, 63, 53, 57, 66, 64 of 1999 and 3 of 2000, decided on 12th May, 2000.

2000SCMR1137

Syed ZAFAR ALI SHAH and others — Petitioner Versus General PERVEZ MUSHARRAF, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1999
Civil Appeals Nos.. 532 and 589 of 1997, decided on 23rd December, 1998.

1999SCMR573

Sheikh RAFIQUE AHMED — Appellant Versus ZIA SHAHID and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1980
Constitutional Petition No. 863 of 1973, decided on 9th April 1980.

P L D 1980 Karachi 345

SHAMIMUR REHMAN-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-

Court: 0. VI, r. 17-Pleadings-Amendment-Rule that once one kind of mala fide alleged detenu not to be allowed to adduce proof of any other kind of mala fide-as laid down in P L D 1969 S C 14-Held, relates to power of Court to wake enquiry into allegations of mala fides within ambit of its Constitutional jurisdiction and does not bar right of any party to amend pleading.-Pleadings.
PTD 2017
Writ Petition No.1618 of 2015, decided on 7th July, 2017.

2017 P T D 2269

Messrs TELENOR PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others

Court: Islamabad High Court