Home Maxims & Terms Time barred application meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Time barred application

Time barred application legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 CLD 759 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 9, 10 & 12Leave to defend suitTime barred application

Suit filed by respondent was decreed against appellant Bank as it did not file application for leave to defend the suit within statutory period

Validity

Appellant Bank despite service through publication did not approach Trial Court to obtain copy of plaint enabling same to file application for leave to defend the suit within stipulated period

Failure of appellant Bank to obtain leave to defend the suit as required under law left no option with Trial Court but to decree the suit based on averments made in plaint, in terms of S. 9(4) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001

No illegality was committed by Banking Court, which could be taken care of

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Time barred application", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954166

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Time barred application"

PLC(CS) 2000
Writ Petitions Nos. 12349 to 12352 of 1997, decided on 4th October, 1999.

2000 P L C (C

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, PASROOR through Chairman and others Versus COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER/AUTHORITY, SIALKOT and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1988
Suit No.756 of 1986, decided on 16th August, 1987.

1988 C L C 2060

MIDDLE EAST BANK Ltd‑‑Plaintiff Versus Messrs UNIVERSAL RICE AND GRAIN ESTABLISHMENT and 8 others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1983
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in First Rent Appeal No. 981 of 1980, decided on 11th January, 1981.

1983 C L C 1221

Mst. BASHIRAN AND ANOTHER — Appellants Versus Mst. SHAHZADI BEGUM AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1993
Civil Appeal No.6 of 1992, decided on 8th November, 1992.

1993 C L C 169

MUHAMAMD YASIN and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus AKRAM and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J & K
PTD 2005
C.T.R. No.189 of 1997, decided on 14th March, 2005.

2005 P T D 1456

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, FAISALABAD Versus Messrs RASHID TEXTILE

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 1991
Revision Application No. SUK‑243 of 1'990, decided on 11th May, 1991.

1991 P L C 894

S. MUHAMMAD SHAFI Versus THE DIVISIONAL SUPE RINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR and 2 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
CLC 1984
Revision Application N0.51 of 1974, decided on 31st May, 1983.

1994 C L C 2564

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ and 3 others‑‑Appellants Versus KARAM ALI TAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
MLD 1992
Suit No.704 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos.5853 and 5854 of 1990, decided on 28th May, 1991.

1992 M L D 1039

Messrs UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus Messrs ALI OIL MILLS and 4 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLC 1988
Constitutional Petition No.83 of 1987, decided on 7th March, 1988.

1988 P L C 648

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO.V, KARACHI and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 2012
2011-December-15

2012 C L C 1227

MANZOOR ELLAHI QURESHI through Legal Heirs — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD BILAL ABBAS and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar