Home Maxims & Terms Paternity of children meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Paternity of children

Paternity of children legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLD 327 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 128(1)(a)West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act (V of 1962), S.2Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.I, R.10(2)Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42Suit for declarationPaternity of childrenDNA test

Declaratory suit filed by the father seeking a declaration to the effect that he was not the natural/biological father of the children born during subsistence of his marriage, and that a DNA test be conducted to establish his denial of paternity

Non-impleadment of children as parties to the declaratory suit

Effect

Children in the present case had not been impleaded as parties in the suit filed by the father-plaintiff, which was a fatal flaw in the plaintiff's case and was by itself sufficient for the purpose of dismissing the suit because the mother could not act for or be compelled to act for or on behalf of the minor children

Fourteen years had passed since the institution of the suit, and it was quite extraordinary that the children who were to suffer opprobrium and vilification without their fault, for the rest of their lives should stand condemned without being given an opportunity of defending themselves through a proper and fair trial

Children were denied their right to plead the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat)

No DNA test to determine paternity could possibly be conducted without the participation and involvement of the children whose legitimacy was being denied

Mother was wholly irrelevant for the purpose of a paternity test, however such aspect of the case had been overlooked by courts below

Appeal was allowed accordingly and declaratory suit filed by father was dismissed.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Paternity of children", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954218

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Paternity of children"

SCMR 1968
Civil Petitions for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 336 and 370 of 1967, decided on 8th January 1968.

1968 SCMR 335

IFTIKHAR NAZIR AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus AHMAD MUKHTAR AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2015
2015-February-2

P L D 2015 Supreme Court 327

GHAZALA TEHSIN ZOHRA — Appellant Versus Mehr GHULAM DASTAGIR KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2009
2008-May-28

2009 C L C 137

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. MUMTAZ AKHTAR alias ALLAH RAKHI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2024
2024-September-9

P L D 2024 Supreme Court 1223

Moulvi ABDUL FATEH — Petitioner Versus YAR MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2020
2019-December-6

2020 M L D 1008

Dr. NOOR MUHAMMAD SALEEMI SAGGU — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
SCMR 1983
Civil Appeals Nos. 94 and 95 of 1974, decided on 4th May, 1983.

1983 S C M R 688

SAFDAR ALI KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Mst. RASHID QAMAR SULTANA AND OTHES — Respondents

Court: -- And Caste Disabilities Removal Act (XXI of 1850)--Muhammadan Law-Marriage-Requirements of form and ceremony, legality and validity of marriage between a Sikh male and a Muslim female such Muslim female treated as a maid-servant, a keep or a mistress as distinguished from a wife-Sons of such woman neither receiving any allowance and privileges allowed to heirs of Sikh male nor acknowledged or recognized by him to be his sons-Held, such factual background disproved existence of a marriage, same having been kept secret, nor such relationship finds recognition in agri cultural custom of Punjab-Marriage between such male and female cannot be inferred or presumed on basis of any enacted law, principle of law or presence of an acknowledgment and recognition by spouses concerned or by public generally.-Muhammadan Law Custom (Punjab).
PLD 2000
Shariat Petitions Nos.29/I, 32/1, 37/1, 42/1, 13/L of 1993, 3/I, 28/1, 6/L, 10/L, 11/L of 1994, 15/I, 18/1, 19/I, 5/L, 7/1 of 1995, 3/I, 4/I, 6/1, 10/I, 11/1, 13/I of 1996, 10/I, 4/L, 14/I of 1997, 10/I, 1/L, 2/L of 1998, 14/1, 16/1, 26/1 of 1994, 2/P, 2/1 of 1996, 4/I of 1994, 7/1, 27/1, 21/1 of 19()5 and 11/I of 1998, decided on 5th January, 2000.

P L D 2000 Federal Shariat Court1

ALLAH RAKHA and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Resultantly subsection (3) and subsection (5) of section 7 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 are repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam and it is directed that the President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan shall take steps to amend the law so as to bring the above provisions into conformity with the Injunctions of Islam. The above provisions of subsection (3? and subsection (5) which have been held to be repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam shall cease to have effect on 31 st day of March, 2000. p. 60 P
MLD 1989
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29/H of 1989, decided on 24th May, 1989.

1989 M L D 3772

Mst. MUHAMMAD JAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mir AKBAR and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2026
2025-March-19

2026 C L C 673

AMNA FAYYAZ — Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE (WEST) ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
PLD 2011
2011-July-6

P L D 2011 Lahore 610

GHAFOOR AHMED BUTT — Petitioner Versus Mst. IRAM BUTT and 6 others — Respondents

Court: High Court