Paternity of children
Paternity of children legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Declaratory suit filed by the father seeking a declaration to the effect that he was not the natural/biological father of the children born during subsistence of his marriage, and that a DNA test be conducted to establish his denial of paternity
Non-impleadment of children as parties to the declaratory suit
Effect
Children in the present case had not been impleaded as parties in the suit filed by the father-plaintiff, which was a fatal flaw in the plaintiff's case and was by itself sufficient for the purpose of dismissing the suit because the mother could not act for or be compelled to act for or on behalf of the minor children
Fourteen years had passed since the institution of the suit, and it was quite extraordinary that the children who were to suffer opprobrium and vilification without their fault, for the rest of their lives should stand condemned without being given an opportunity of defending themselves through a proper and fair trial
Children were denied their right to plead the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, and the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat)
No DNA test to determine paternity could possibly be conducted without the participation and involvement of the children whose legitimacy was being denied
Mother was wholly irrelevant for the purpose of a paternity test, however such aspect of the case had been overlooked by courts below
Appeal was allowed accordingly and declaratory suit filed by father was dismissed.
"Paternity of children", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954218
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Paternity of children"
1968 SCMR 335
IFTIKHAR NAZIR AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus AHMAD MUKHTAR AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2015 Supreme Court 327
GHAZALA TEHSIN ZOHRA — Appellant Versus Mehr GHULAM DASTAGIR KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2009 C L C 137
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. MUMTAZ AKHTAR alias ALLAH RAKHI and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2024 Supreme Court 1223
Moulvi ABDUL FATEH — Petitioner Versus YAR MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2020 M L D 1008
Dr. NOOR MUHAMMAD SALEEMI SAGGU — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1983 S C M R 688
SAFDAR ALI KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Mst. RASHID QAMAR SULTANA AND OTHES — Respondents
Court: -- And Caste Disabilities Removal Act (XXI of 1850)--Muhammadan Law-Marriage-Requirements of form and ceremony, legality and validity of marriage between a Sikh male and a Muslim female such Muslim female treated as a maid-servant, a keep or a mistress as distinguished from a wife-Sons of such woman neither receiving any allowance and privileges allowed to heirs of Sikh male nor acknowledged or recognized by him to be his sons-Held, such factual background disproved existence of a marriage, same having been kept secret, nor such relationship finds recognition in agri cultural custom of Punjab-Marriage between such male and female cannot be inferred or presumed on basis of any enacted law, principle of law or presence of an acknowledgment and recognition by spouses concerned or by public generally.-Muhammadan Law Custom (Punjab).P L D 2000 Federal Shariat Court1
ALLAH RAKHA and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Resultantly subsection (3) and subsection (5) of section 7 of Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 are repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam and it is directed that the President of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan shall take steps to amend the law so as to bring the above provisions into conformity with the Injunctions of Islam. The above provisions of subsection (3? and subsection (5) which have been held to be repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam shall cease to have effect on 31 st day of March, 2000. p. 60 P1989 M L D 3772
Mst. MUHAMMAD JAN‑‑Petitioner Versus Mir AKBAR and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2026 C L C 673
AMNA FAYYAZ — Appellant Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE (WEST) ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents
Court: IslamabadP L D 2011 Lahore 610
GHAFOOR AHMED BUTT — Petitioner Versus Mst. IRAM BUTT and 6 others — Respondents
Court: High Court