Home Maxims & Terms Consent of complainant meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Consent of complainant

Consent of complainant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 MLD 925 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.426Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 395 & 452Dacoity and house trespassSentence, suspension ofConsent of complainantAccused persons were convicted under Ss. 395 & 452, P.P.C. for imprisonment for seven years and five years respectivelyValidityDeeper appreciation of evidence could not be undertaken at such stage

Complainant and eyewitnesses who were present in Court extended their no objection in shape of affidavits to suspension of sentences awarded to accused persons and their release on bail

Sentences were suspended in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Consent of complainant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954223

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Consent of complainant"

PCRLJN 2017
N/A

2017 P Cr

FAYYAZ — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJ 2020
2019-December-2

2020 P Cr

ADNAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1965
Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 1963, decided on 15th June 1965.

P L D 1965 (W

THE STATE-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASH RAF-Accused-Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 2020
2020-January-28

2020 P Cr

MUHAMMAD JAMEEL and another — Applicants Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
YLR 2002
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 7475 of 2001, decided on 21st December, 2001.

2002 Y L R 136

AZAM WATTO and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2015
2014-July-17

2015 M L D 925

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PTD 2008
Complaint No.C-41-K of 2004, decided on 18th May, 2004.

2008 P T D 962

Messrs DOSSA COTTON & GENERAL TRADING (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
SCMR 1982
Criminal Petition No. 47‑P of 1981, decided on 14th June, 1982.

1982 S C M R 1114

MUTAHIR SHAH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
YLRN 2017
Crl. Bail Applications Nos.163 and 642 of 2015, decided on 14th April, 2016.

2017 Y L R Note 363

MALIKUDDIN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)
YLRN 2023
2020-February-19

2023 Y L R Note 9

NOORULLAH — Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD FARRUKH and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh