Home Maxims & Terms Adjudication of appeals meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Adjudication of appeals

Adjudication of appeals legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 SCMR 945 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 107 & 100Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 37(d)General provisions relating to appealsAdjudication of appealsRemand of caseInexpensive and expeditious justiceScopeRemand should only be resorted to where it was absolutely necessary for fair and proper adjudication of a case

Unnecessary remand resulted in undue delay in cases and consequent prolonging of agony of litigants as well as clogging the court dockets and wastage of precious court time

Supreme Court observed that courts were to bear in the mind the constitutional imperative requiring the State to "ensure inexpensive and expeditious justice".

2015 PTD 1330 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 46,45, 8A & 8BIncome Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 132 & 133Appellate TribunalAdjudication of appealsDetermination of factsDuties and obligations of Appellate TribunalMatters relating to sales tax refundsScope

Appellate Tribunal was the last fact finding forum in the hierarchy of taxation laws and therefore it was bound to discharge its functions diligently

Any opinion on law, by the Appellate Tribunal would lose its credence for consideration by High Court in its advisory jurisdiction if findings of fact arrived at by the Appellate Tribunal were not trustworthy

In case true facts were not ascertainable from available record; Appellate Tribunal was vested with vast powers under S. 132(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to call for any particulars relating to an appeal or cause further enquiry to be made by Commissioner during the appeal proceedings

Under S. 132(3)(c) of the income Tax Ordinance, 2001; Appellate Tribunal could remand a case to the Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) for making such an enquiry or taking an action as the Appellate Tribunal may direct

While dealing with matters relating to refund, particularly under the Sales Tax Act, 1990; Appellate Tribunal was required to keep a balance, to ensure issuance of refund to a registered person in accordance with law and protect against fraudulent claims based on fake and flying invoices

Tax which had not been deposited in the national exchequer should not be allowed to be refunded due to a lapse on part of the authorities under a statute and comprehensive mechanism was given in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 both for expeditious issuance of refund and for protecting the national exchequer from any loss

Appellate Tribunal and the tax authorities were required to keep in mind the principle embodied in S.8A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which enjoined joint and several liability on registered persons in the supply chain, if a registered person receiving taxable supply from another registered person had reasonable grounds to suspect that some or all of tax payable in respect of the supplies would go unpaid

Rationale behind more than one appellate forum in the taxation laws was to cross-check the exercise of powers by the authorities and ensure proper taxation under the statute.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Adjudication of appeals", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954229

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Adjudication of appeals"

SCMR 2015
Civil Appeal No.548 of 2009, decided on 17th April, 2015.

2015 S C M R 945

Messrs SHAH NAWAZ KHAN AND SONS — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1996
Constitutional Petition No.D‑602 of 1995, decided on 28th November, 1995

1996 M L D 1749

Dr. RAEES FARHAN MUSHTAQ and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NAHEED alias MONA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2015
Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2012, decided on 14th November, 2012.

2015 Y L R 834

RAHAT SHAH — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan
PLD 2014
2013-October-10

P L D 2014 Sindh 95

INAYATULLAH ANSARI and 2 others — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PTD 2021
Writ Petitions Nos.2121-P and 2122-P of 2021, decided on 27th May, 2021.

2021 P T D 1273

Messrs HAMDAAN ENTERPRISES through Proprietor and another Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT AND FACILITATION) MCC, CUSTOMS HOUSE, PESHAWAR and another

Court: Peshawar High Court
SCMR 1988
Civil Appeals Nos.443 and 543 of 1980, decided on 29th June, 1988

1988 S C M R 1955

NOOR MUHAMMAD and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2015
Criminal Appeal No.110 of 2014, decided on 8th July, 2014.

2015 Y L R 580

ZAFAR MEHMOOD — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2010
merits; and law favoured adjudication of rights of the parties on merits---Case was at initial stage and only one opportunity was provided to the plaintiff for filing correct address of defendant; it was in the interest of justice to decide the case on merits and not on technical basis---Appeal was accepted, impugned order of Appellate Court was set aside and case was remanded to the Appellate Court for fresh adjudication of appeal on merits and to provide one opportunity to the plaintiff for filing the correct address of the defendant

P L D 2010 High Court (AJ&K) 21

REHMAN BEGUM — Appellant Versus HASSAN MUHAMMAD — Respondent

Court: High Court
PTD 2003
W.T.As. Nos. 62/IB to 64/IB of 2001-2002, decided on 4th April, 2003.

2003 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
CLC 1988
Writ Petition No. 4801 of 1987, decided on 26th October, 1987.

1988 C L C 3

Mst. BASHIRAN and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus ATAUL HAQ and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore