Home Maxims & Terms Determination of facts meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Determination of facts

Determination of facts legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PTD 1330 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 46,45, 8A & 8BIncome Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Ss. 132 & 133Appellate TribunalAdjudication of appealsDetermination of factsDuties and obligations of Appellate TribunalMatters relating to sales tax refundsScope

Appellate Tribunal was the last fact finding forum in the hierarchy of taxation laws and therefore it was bound to discharge its functions diligently

Any opinion on law, by the Appellate Tribunal would lose its credence for consideration by High Court in its advisory jurisdiction if findings of fact arrived at by the Appellate Tribunal were not trustworthy

In case true facts were not ascertainable from available record; Appellate Tribunal was vested with vast powers under S. 132(1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 to call for any particulars relating to an appeal or cause further enquiry to be made by Commissioner during the appeal proceedings

Under S. 132(3)(c) of the income Tax Ordinance, 2001; Appellate Tribunal could remand a case to the Commissioner or Commissioner (Appeals) for making such an enquiry or taking an action as the Appellate Tribunal may direct

While dealing with matters relating to refund, particularly under the Sales Tax Act, 1990; Appellate Tribunal was required to keep a balance, to ensure issuance of refund to a registered person in accordance with law and protect against fraudulent claims based on fake and flying invoices

Tax which had not been deposited in the national exchequer should not be allowed to be refunded due to a lapse on part of the authorities under a statute and comprehensive mechanism was given in the Sales Tax Act, 1990 both for expeditious issuance of refund and for protecting the national exchequer from any loss

Appellate Tribunal and the tax authorities were required to keep in mind the principle embodied in S.8A of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 which enjoined joint and several liability on registered persons in the supply chain, if a registered person receiving taxable supply from another registered person had reasonable grounds to suspect that some or all of tax payable in respect of the supplies would go unpaid

Rationale behind more than one appellate forum in the taxation laws was to cross-check the exercise of powers by the authorities and ensure proper taxation under the statute.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Determination of facts", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954230

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of facts"

MLD 1996
First Rent Appeal No. 112 of 1989, decided on 20th April, 1995.

1996 M L D 806

SULTAN ALI ‑‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. KHATIJA BAI‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1985
Civil Petition No.276/R of 1984, decided on 21st October, 1984.

1985 S C M R 135

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — Petitioner Versus ABID HUSSAIN — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 2011
N/A

P L D 2011 Lahore 412

SHER MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2019
Customs Reference No. 7863 of 2019, decided on 11th February, 2019.

2019 P T D 1088

Messrs AH TEXTILES Versus The DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION FBR and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2020
Income Tax Reference No.11885 of 2019, decided on 28th February, 2019.

2020 P T D 260

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE Versus Messrs GREENVELLY PREMIUM SUPER MARKET (PVT.) LTD.

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC 2006
Constitution No.D-648 of 2005, decided on 19th January, 2006.

2006 P L C 263

MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (Regd.) through Treasurer Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Labour and Corporate, Karachi and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeal No. 1096 of 1990, decided on 17th November, 1992.

1993 S C M R 1955

Sheikh FAQIR MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD DIN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2022
Civil Petition No.757-L of 2021, decided on 3rd February, 2022.

2022 P T D 1079

COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Versus Messrs SARGODHA SPINNING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. FAISALABAD and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2007
C.P.L.A. No.168-K of 2006, decided on 12th October, 2006.

2007 S C M R 1209

MUHAMMAD MAHMOOD BAWANI — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY CONTROLLER BUILDING ZONE-B and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2022
Civil Petition No.757-L of 2021, decided on 3rd February, 2022.

2022 S C M R 1082

COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE,LAHORE — Petitioner Versus Messrs SARGODHA SPINNING MILLS (PVT.) LTD. FAISALABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan