Home Maxims & Terms Meaning and distinction meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Meaning and distinction

Meaning and distinction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 PLD 522 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art.140ALocal Government systemDecentralization of powersModes of decentralizationDeconcentration, Delegation and DevolutionMeaning and distinction

Deconcentration was the shallowest form of decentralization and the least ambitious level of decentralization, where responsibilities were transferred to an administrative unit of the central government that was spatially closer to the population where service was to be provided, usually a field or regional office

Delegation was an intermediate level of decentralization, where some authority and responsibilities were transferred to a lower level of government, but there was a principal-agent relationship between the central and sub-national government in question, with the agent remaining accountable to the principal

Devolution was the deepest form and most ambitious form of decentralization, where the central government devolved responsibility, authority, and accountability to sub-national governments with some degree of political autonomy.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Meaning and distinction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954301

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning and distinction"

PTD 2007
Constitution Petitions Nos. D-154 and D-737 of 1995, decided on 29th September, 2006.

2007 P T D 60

Messrs MORO TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED through Chairman Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman, Islamabad and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC 1987
Revision No.LHR‑476 of 1986, decided on 14th February, 1987.

1987 P L C 777

PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus SULEMAN KHAN

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1977
Constitutional Petition No. 915 of 1975, decided on 7th April 1977.

P L D 1977 Karachi 582

SHAH NAZAR KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND S. D. M., MALIR, KARACHI AND 3 others — Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑ S. 14, cl. (xvii)‑Interpretation of statutes ‑‑.Word 'habit' Meaning.‑Interpretation of statutes‑Words and phrases.
PTD 1989
Civil Appeals Nos. 1905 and 1906 of 1974 and 3414 of 1984, decided on 29th March,1989.

1989 P T D 1319

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY Versus RASIKLAL MANEKLAL (HUF)

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLD 2021
2021-January-27

P L D 2021 Supreme Court 571

Mian IRFAN BASHIR — Petitioner Versus The DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (D.C.), LAHORE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
Civil Appeal No. 57 of 1974, decided on 20th February 1976.

P L D 1976 Supreme Court 258

THE CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT SCREENING COMMITTEE, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑‑Appellants Versus SHARIF AHMAD HASHMI‑Respondent

Court: S. 2(g) & (i)‑Words and pbrases‑"Void"= `Voidable"‑Meanings and distinction.‑Words and phrases.
MLD 2011
2011-June-22

2011 M L D 1987

Messrs COCA-COLA BEVERAGES — Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD CHAKLALA, RAWALPINDI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1989
Civil Miscellanous Petition No.l of 1989, decided on 17th June, 1989.

1989A214

Present: Raja Muhammad Khurshid Khan, CJ. And Sardar Said Muhammad Khan, J Versus AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR MINERAL AND INDUSTRIAL

Court: ‑‑‑Ss.33 & 2(c)‑‑"Court"‑‑Meaning‑‑Word "Court" appearing in S.33 read with S.2(c) would mean a Civil Court having jurisdiction to decide question forming the subject‑matter of the reference if the same had been made the subject‑matter of the suit‑‑Only such Court would have jurisdiction to resolve the controversy between the parties in which an award had been filed or may be filed and no other Court‑‑Court which would have jurisdiction to try a civil suit would have jurisdiction in respect of the question forming the subject‑matter of a. reference.‑ Words and phrases.
CLD 2015
N/A

2015 C L D 1297

Messrs UNIQUE SCHOOL — Appellant Versus Messrs UNIQUE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1992
Criminal Revision No.50 of 1990, decided on 20th March, 1991

P L D 1992 Lahore 314

Haji MUHAMMAD HANIF‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondcnt

Court: