Fabrication of evidence
Fabrication of evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Perjury and fabrication of documentary evidence were to be taken very seriously by Courts, as this was necessary for ensuring that the administration of justice was not undermined and baseless and false litigation was also deterred.
"Fabrication of evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954497
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fabrication of evidence"
1988 P Cr
AMJAD SULTAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1975 S C M R 281
MIR AKBAR-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: High Court2007 P Cr
IKRAMULLAH — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Peshawar2023 Y L R 431
MUHAMMAD NAZEER — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUSTAFA — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)2015 S C M R 1373
AMEER REHMAN and others — Appellants Versus AMEER MUMTAZ and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1982 S C M R 291
SAID RAHMAN AND ANOTHER — Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondents
Court: -- S. 302 read with S. 303, Exception IV & S. 304, Part I-Murder case-Vicarious responsibility-Sudden fight-Police promptly informed of occurrence by appellant accused on telephone-Investigating Officer arriving at spot, a public place, and finding injuries caused to both sides mostly by fire-arms-Venue of offence being a public place, fabrication of evidence not likely to have gone unnoticed-Three persons effectively armed if taking up positions and indulging in reckless faring, as alleged by prosecution, on a group of persons at their mercy, injuries far more numerous and graver likely to have been caused-No explanation given by prosecution for injuries on person of one on opposite side and for serious damage caused by firing to car of another accused appellant-None of parties in circumstances appearing to have, made complete and true disclosure of facts or material suppression indulged in both versions-Inferences properly flowing from Evidence and circumstances : that a chance encounter of two groups. took place in bazar, both sides fired at each other, certain apparently unconcerned persons, happening to be there on routine also receiving injuries from stray shots, even deceased himself not object of any planned or brutal attack as disclosed by his receiving only one inlet fire-arm wound on front of chest and five others on foot or heel-Bullet a pellet recovered from dead body suggesting more than one weapon having been used by more than one assailant Appellant's plea of being direct object of surprise attack and being on defensive not appearing plausible or consistent with venue, nature, and extent of damage to person and property-Material on record reasonably leading to conclusion of there being a sudden fight, both sides using fire arms, none taking undue advantage, there being no common intention, and each person being responsible for his own act.1994 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ alias BADI and 2 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court1997 P Cr
Mst. FAIZAN BIBI and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1970 P Cr
AQIL AHMAD-Applicant Versus A. RAUF — Respondent
Court: High Court DhacaP L D 2007 Lahore 440
REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE — Petitioner Versus Messrs GEO T.V. through Chairman and 8 others — Respondents
Court: