Home Maxims & Terms Determination of damages meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Determination of damages

Determination of damages legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLD 183 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 9 & 22Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972), S. 3Suit for recovery of damagesIntra-court appealDetermination of damagesPrinciple

Plaintiff company was aggrieved of notices issued by defendant Bank which had put a lien on the foreign currency account of plaintiff

Plaintiff sought recovery of damages against defendant Bank

Validity

To substantiate claim of damages based on losses suffered due to act of defendant Bank as alleged, it was incumbent upon plaintiff to demonstrate that such losses in fact had occurred during such period by quantifying and substantiating them, whereafter damages proportionate to such losses could have been claimed

Damages could not be awarded on such expectation or on hearsay evidence, it had to be specific with transactions and the quantum of losses so as to claim damages in retrospect

Single Judge of High Court rightly declined to allow damages to plaintiff against defendant Bank

Intra-court appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Determination of damages", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124954993

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of damages"

CLC 2007
2007-October-11

2007 C L C 1964

AFTAB HUSSAIN — Plaintiff Versus SOHAIL YOUSUF — Defendant

Court: Karachi
YLR 1999
Suits Nos.839, 840, 942, 943 and 944 of 1987, decided on 6th April, 1999.

1999 Y L R 883

Malik MUHAMMAD SAEED‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS and others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 2006
2006-August-21

P L D 2006 Karachi 691

ABDUL GHAFOOR — Plaintiff Versus Syed JAWED HUSSAIN JAFFREY and another — Defendants

Court: High Court
PTD 2002
Tax Cases Nos.115 and 116 of 1989 (References Nos.42 and 43 of 1989), decided on 16th December, 1998.

2002 P T D 1295

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SESHASAYEE INDUSTRIES LTD.

Court: 242 I T R 691
CLD 2020
2019-November-22

2020 C L D 954

BANK ISLAMI PAKISTAN LIMITED through President — Appellant Versus MANZAR MASOOD — Respondent

Court: Sindh
YLR 2017
Revision Application No.41 of 2010, decided on 2nd December, 2016.

2017 Y L R 804

KARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION through Administrator — Applicant Versus ISLAMUDDIN and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1955
Second Appeal No. 87 of 1952, decided on 6th October, 1954 from the decree of Sayed Muhammad Abdul Latif, Additional District Judge, Lyallpur, dated the 29th November, 1951, reversing that of Ch. Muhammad Ali, Civil Judge First Class, Toba Tek Singh, dated the 9th May, 1951.

P L D 1955 Lahore 52

S. MAHMUD HUSSAIN SHAH Plaintiff-Appellant Versus CO‑OPERATIVE MULTIPURPOSE SOCIETY INDARJIT COTTON FACTORY, GOJRA — Defendant‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2019
High Court Appeal No.333 of 2016, decided on 10th July, 2018.

2019 Y L R 1167

DELHI MERCANTILE MUSLIM COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. through Honorary General Secretary — Appellant Versus ALAMGIR WELFARE TRUST INTERNATIONAL through Managing Trustee and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 1989
Original Suit No. 1 of 1976, decided on 8th May, 1988.

1989 C L C 916

MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑‑Plaintiff Versus NATIONAL MOTORS LTD.‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
PLD 1996
Civil Appeal No. 1020 of 1995, decided on 17th March 1996.

P L D 1996 Supreme Court 737

Sufi MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE ‑‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE METROPOLITAN CORPORATION, LAHORE through Mayor ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court: