Completion of proceedings
Completion of proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Authorities were aggrieved of direction issued by Appellate Tribunal to appellate authority for completing proceedings within sixty days
Plea raised by authorities was that Income Tax Appellate Tribunal could not reduce time frame as provided under S. 124(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Validity
Reference to S. 124(2) of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, by authorities was misconceived, as it provided a maximum time limit to taxation officer to pass an order after remand by Appellate Tribunal, High Court or Supreme Court and the same could not be treated as minimum time period to pass such order after remand
No error or illegality was found in the order passed by Appellate Tribunal, whereby matter had been remanded to concerned taxation officer with certain directions to decide case preferably within a period of sixty days
Reference was disposed of accordingly.
"Completion of proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955003
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Completion of proceedings"
2009 P L C (C
AFTAB AHMED KOLACHI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 2 others
Court: Karachi High Court2002 Y L R 2792
Messrs TRIPPLE‑M (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director, Shahid Malik ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 4 others‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1979 Lahore 511
MUHAMMAD TAFIQ alias TARI-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: --- S. 497 read with Ss. 87, 88 & 512-Bail-Petitioner said to have been armed with a carbine and rest of accused said to have fired resulting in simple injuries to three persons-Trial not commencing, despite lapse of 1 years and 22 adjournments due to non-completion of proceedings under Ss. 87, 88 & 512-Serious lapse on part of Court resulting in detention of petitioner without trial for no fault of his-Such conduct to be highly deprecated-Case of petitioner no worse than that of his co-accused already granted bail-Petitioner ordered to be released on bail.--Delay.2011 P L C (C
ABDUL KARIM BURINO Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1976 Karachi 1002
S. J. & FAZUL.ELLAHIE LTD.‑Appellant Versus BAYER HAND ELSGESELLISCHAFT M. B. G.‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Evidence recorded in earlier suit ordered, by consent of parties, to be read in another case filed later, unless Court decided to record further evidence‑Possibility of recording further evidence, in circumstances. existing Decision of earlier suit without waiting for completion of proceedings in other case, held, not faulty in circum stances.‑Evidence.2013 Y L R 54
ALLAH WADHAYO — Applicant Versus THE STATE and 16 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2006 C L C 258
MUNAWAR HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2012 P T D (Trib
C.I.R., ZONE-I, R.T.O., KARACHI Versus Messrs CENTURY — 21 SPORTSWEAR, KARACHI
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan2015 P T D 2004
Messrs ADVANCE BUSINESS SYSTEM and others Versus FOP and others
Court: Islamabad High Court