Discriminate firing
Discriminate firing legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Nature and number of wounds on the deceased and empties recovered from the spot, gave rise to the question that more persons had fired at the deceased
Said factor made the case one of further inquiry and made accused entitled to concession of bail
Bail was allowed accordingly.
Similar role of discriminate firing had been attributed to accused and absconding co-accused, but only five empties of thirty-bore weapon along with a spent bullet had been recovered from spot
Forensic Science Report, revealed that all said five empties had been fired from one and same thirty-bore weapon, which gave rise to the question as to whether one or more persons had fired at the victims
Said factor alone made case one of further probe and made accused entitled to concession of bail
Bail applications were allowed accordingly.
"Discriminate firing", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955052
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Discriminate firing"
2016 P Cr
NAZAR GUL — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2012 Y L R 1066
ALLAHYAR — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2003 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SALEEM alias PASHA and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2017 P Cr
MIR DIL KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar2017 M L D 1204
NABI DAD and another — Applicants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Balochistan2019 P Cr
JAWAHIR KHAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtP L D 1993 Lahore 801
ABDUL RASHID alias SHIDA GADI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus THE STATE ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:2014 Y L R 2297
AHSAN AHMED MASTOI — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2008 Y L R 2587
NADIR HUSSAIN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore