Home Maxims & Terms Dismissal of time barred appeal meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dismissal of time barred appeal

Dismissal of time barred appeal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 CLC 213 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
R.70Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionTime barred appealEffectPetitioner assailed order passed by authorities in appeal filed by respondent restoring its prospecting licensePlea raised by petitioner was that appeal filed by respondent was barred by 20 yearsValidity

Remedy as provided under R.70 of Balochistan Mineral Rules, 2002 was not availed within prescribed period of limitation and appellate authority exercised its jurisdiction wrongly

Delay had been condoned for reasons not recognized by law

Initial appeal having been filed beyond stipulated period and without explanation of delay and was not sustainable

High Court set aside order restoring prospecting license in favour of respondent

Constitutional petition was allowed under circumstances.

2016 PLC 13 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 41, 54(3) & 55Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199Constitutional petitionRegularization of serviceGrievance petitionDismissal of time barred appeal

Grievance petition filed by the employee for regularization of his service, having been accepted by the Labour Court, employer filed appeal before Labour Appellate Tribunal

Said appeal being barred by four days, was dismissed and employer had filed constitutional petition against judgment of the Appellate Tribunal

Employer failed to explain the delay of each day before Appellate Tribunal

Labour Appellate Tribunal, in circumstances, had rightly dismissed appeal being barred by time.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dismissal of time barred appeal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955238

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dismissal of time barred appeal"

SCMR 1986
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 852 of 1979, decided on 16th December, 1980.

1986 S C M R 782

ZIA MOHIUDDIN KHAN — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY-GENERAL, FINANCE and 4 others — Respondents

Court: ---Art. 212(3)--Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), S. 22(2)- Limitation--Dismissal of time-barred appeal, challenged--Time spent in making second representation not computed towards limitation as S.22(2) of Act did not permit a number of representations to be made--Impugned order not open to interference--Leave to appeal refused.--Limitation.
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition No.249-R of 1987, decided on 2nd July, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1859

HAQ NAWAZ PATWARI — Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KHANEWAL and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1987
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 284‑R of 1985, decided on 2nd November, 1986.

1987 S C M R 110

Qazi FAIZUL HAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through CHIEF SECRETARY, PESHAWAR Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Civil Revision No.108 of 1987, decided on 16th September,1987.

1988 C L C 65

GUL BARAN and 5 others‑‑Petitioners Versus ABDUL ZAHIR and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLC 2016
Writ Petition No.13293 of 2011, decided on 23rd June, 2015.

2016 P L C 13

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2010
2010-January-15

P L D 2010 Lahore 175

Mrs. NASIRA IQBAL — Petitioner Versus APPEAL COMMITTEE (PUNJAB NO.II), PAKISTAN BAR COUNCIL through Chairman and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 1989
Appeal No. Nil, decided on 19th January, 1989.

1989 M L D 1864

DISTRICT BAR ASSOCIATION, LAHORE‑‑Appellant Versus S.M.SAMIUZZAMIR ADVOCATE and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Appeal Committee (Punjab II) Pakistan Bar Council
PLD 2014
2014-February-24

P L D 2014 Lahore 369

HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, RAWALPINDI through Taufiq Asif, President and Members Executive Committee — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL through Vice Chairman and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2000
Writ Petition No. 12104 of 2000, heard on 11th July, 2000.

2000 M L D 1962

ATTA ULLAH KHAN NIAZI, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Appellant Versus Rao MUHAMMAD USMAN KHAN, ADVOCATE and 8 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS)N 2017
Civil Appeal No.281 of 2014, decided on 7th January, 2015.

2017 P L C (C

SHAUKAT HUSSAIN AWAN Versus AJ&K BAR COUNCIL through Vice-Chairman, AJK Bar Council, Muzaffarabad and 4 others

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)