Home Maxims & Terms Meaning and relevance meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Meaning and relevance

Meaning and relevance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLD 289 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2(1)(k) & 4Prohibited agreementTerm 'relevant market'Meaning and relevanceCollusive practices

For purposes of S. 4 of Competition Act, 2010, definition of 'relevant market' was not precondition to establish a violation¬¬

In cases of collusion, agreement to collude, instead of market power, was relevant

Identification of 'relevant market' in cases of collusion was merely for purpose of reference, and same was requirement for establishing an anti-competitive action

Enquiry report had limited its specification to overall market for genuine spare parts, as a market in which Member Undertakings operated and competed

Competition Commission observed that principle that 'with a technically homogenous product, it was not possible to distinguish different markets depending upon the dimensions, size or specific type of products' was applicable to present case

Enquiry report was correct in its demarcations of 'relevant market' for purposes of alleged violation under S. 4 of Competition Act, 2010.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Meaning and relevance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955301

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning and relevance"

CLD 2016
2015-April-10

2016 C L D 289

Show Cause Notices Nos.26 to 69 of 2014, dated 16th October, 2014

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
PTD 2000
I.T.A. No.433 of 1998, decided on 29th March, 2000.

2000 P T D 3388

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX/WEALTH TAX Versus Messrs ENGINEERING COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LAHORE

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2002
I.T.A No. 2477/LB of 2001, decided on 7th July, 2001.

2002 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
CLC 2024
2023-December-21

2024 C L C 937

WI-TRIBE (PVT.) LTD. through Head of Legal and Regulatory Affairs — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PTD 1999
Wealth Tax References Nos. 115 to 129 of 1988, decided on 20th February, 1998.

1999 P T D 988

A.H. DALMIA and others Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

Court: 232 I T R 921
CLC 1990
Regular Second Appeal No.128 of 1970, decided on 31st October, 1989.

1990 C L C 274

ANWAR and others‑‑Appellants Versus SHER BAHADUR and others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1985
O. P. No. 2645 of 1980, decided on 22nd June, 1983.

1985 P T D 737

THE KERALA STATE CASHEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Versus THE INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, C‑WARD, TRIVANDRUM AND ANOTHER

Court: Kerala High Court (India)
PTD 1960
Privy Council Appeal No. 57 of 1946, decided on 18th December 1947, from the High Court of Australia.

1960 P T D 954

THE PRODUCERS CO‑OPERATIVE DISTRIBUTING SOCIETY, LID. — Appellants, Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION — Respondent

Court: Privy Council
PTD 1987
Income-tax Case No.19 of 1978 decided on 5th November 1986.

1987 P T D 178

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME — TAX Versus MUSHTAQ MUHAMMAD ALI

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC(CS) 2003
Intra-Court Appeal No.606 of 2001 in Writ Petition No.4017 of 1998, decided on 26th May, 2003.

2003 P L C (C

Dr. NEELAM HUSSAIN Versus Dr. RAZIA PARVEEN QURESHI and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court