Meaning and determination
Meaning and determination legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Pharmaceutical company, pursuant to share and business sale agreement, submitted application seeking clearance for acquisition of global vaccines business in market of meningococcal (ACWY) vaccines from another pharmaceutical company
Only one product from each of the merging parties was substitutable with each other which they had marketed in Pakistan
Market for medicine of other company was no longer a duopolistic market as there was new entrant in the relevant market
Competition Commission identified competition concerns regarding proposed acquisition
Market concentration data of relevant year proposed that transaction would result in only two players in market for the medicine in question in Pakistan
Applicant company, who was already a dominant player, would further strengthen its dominant position in relevant market and thereby increase its market power
Herfindahl Hirshman Index (HHI) calculation based on sales (value) for the relevant year was above 2000, which meant that relevant market was highly concentrated
As per Merger Guidelines, Competition Commission was likely to find horizontal competition concerns in market with post-merger HHI of above 2000 and delta above 250
After consummation of proposed acquisition, applicant company would own and control the product
Other product which was priced higher was used for long term effects for ages under fifty-five years
Applicant company might be able to escalate price of 'product', which would harm end users that were hospital, clinics and pharmacies
Merger parties were particularly close competitors in relevant market with a third company, which was the only other company supplying those products in Pakistan
Merging company would cease to compete independently of applicant company and thereby remove or lessen competition of applicant company with its two significant competitors
Proposed acquisition would weaken competitive constraints on remaining suppliers or distributors, which might offer them with increased incentive or ability to raise prices and/or offer lower levels of service
New entry or expansion in relation to the product required substantial investment in research and development
For same reason, new entrant took many years in entering relevant market in Pakistan
Given effectiveness of each product program which differs in terms of age usage and duration of protection, it was important to have all the products available in market
Applicant company proposed and committed to implement certain commitments to alleviate said competition concerns undertaking to divest its global business; in addition to those commitments, Competition Commission observed that purchaser with respect to divestment must establish presence in distribution channels used in business in Pakistan
Pre-merger application for merger was allowed in circumstances.
"Meaning and determination", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955303
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning and determination"
2023 S C M R 246
Mst. TAYYEBA AMBAREEN and another — Petitioners Versus SHAFQAT ALI KIYANI and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 C L D 402
Show Cause Notice decided on 20th February, 2015.
Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan2009 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal PakistanP L D 2019 Supreme Court 461
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF — Appellant Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 P T D 2111
Messrs ASFAQ TRADING COMPANY through Proprietor Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE, LAHORE through Deputy Collector of Customs (Group-1), Lahore
Court: Lahore High Court2019 S C M R 885
STOCKER — Appellant Versus STOCKER — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of UK*2004 M L D 1089
Haji LIAQAT ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Ch. MUHAMMAD AFZAL SAHI and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Election Tribunal Punjab1984 P T D 116
MUHAMMAD UMER FAROOQUI Versus THE ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF ESTATE DUTY, KARACHI
Court: Karachi High Court2000 P T D 1531
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus HARIHAR JETHALAL JARIWALLA
Court: 234 I T R 12013 M L D 305
MUHAMMAD AJAIB — Appellant Versus TASLEEM WAKEEL — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)