Home Maxims & Terms Inconsistency in findings meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Inconsistency in findings

Inconsistency in findings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 CLC 140 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judgment of Trial Court and Appellate CourtInconsistency in findingsPrinciple

In case of such inconsistency findings of Appellate Court must be given preference in the absence of any cogent reason to the contrary.

2024 CLC 1596 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judgments of Trial Court and Appellate CourtInconsistency in findingsPreference

In case of inconsistency between the findings of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court, the findings of the latter must be given preference in the absence of any cogent reason to the contrary.

2023 YLR 1764 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 100Judgment of Trial Court and Appellate CourtInconsistency in findingsScope

In case of conflicting judgments of Courts below, the findings of the Appellate Court below are to be preferred and respected than that of the Trial Court unless it is shown from the record that such findings are not supported by evidence or the conclusions drawn are against the material on record or the judgment of the Appellate Court suffers from misreading or non-reading of evidence or that the reasons recorded for reversal of judgment of Trial Court are arbitrary, fanciful and perverse.

2016 CLC 553 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 100Judgment of trial court and appellate courtInconsistency in findingsProcedure

High Court in its appellate jurisdiction had to give preference to the findings of Appellate Court in case of variance and dissension in the findings of two courts below unless it suffered from grave irregularity or the same were perverse or the reasons given by the Appellate Court were not sustainable.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Inconsistency in findings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955326

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inconsistency in findings"

CLC 2025
2023-March-31

2025 C L C 140

ABDUL KARIM — Petitioner Versus Mst. RUQQIA BEGUM (Deceased) through L.Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2025
2024-September-24

2025 P Cr

Ali Raza — Petitioner Versus Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
YLR 2023
N/A

2023 Y L R 1764

SARDARA and others — Petitioners Versus MANZOOR BIBI through legal heirs and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2024
N/A

2024 C L C 1596

Mst. SAHIB KHATOON alias SABAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Deceased) through L.Rs. — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 2024
2023-November-1

2024 C L C 141

AYESHA HASHMAT KAMAL and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2015
Civil Appeal No.768 of 2002, decided on 18th September, 2014.

2015 S C M R 1

AMJAD IKRAM — Appellant Versus Mst. ASIYA KAUSAR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2016
2015-April-23

2016 C L C 553

MUHAMMAD YASIN and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD LATIF and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1953
Second Appeal No. 238 of 1951, decided on 19th January, 1953, from the decree of Fayyaz Hassan Shah, Esquire, District Judge, Rawalpindi, dated the 15th June, 1951, affirming that of Aziz Ahmad, Additional Civil Judge, Rawalpindi, dated the 28th August, 1950.

P L D 1953 Lahore 131

ALA‑UD‑DIN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus Mst. FARKHANDA AKHTAR‑Plaintiff‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1982
Judicial Miscellaneous No. 43 of 1981, decided on .6th May 1982.

P L D 1982 Karachi 774

Petitioners Versus QAMRUDDIN M. KHIMANI AND 4 others

Court:
CLC 1985
Civil Suit No. 360 of 1973, decided on 5th May, 1985.

1985 C L C 2146

St. JOHN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION (Pakistan) — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN RED-CROSS SOCIETY and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi