Inconsistency in findings
Inconsistency in findings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
In case of such inconsistency findings of Appellate Court must be given preference in the absence of any cogent reason to the contrary.
In case of inconsistency between the findings of the Trial Court and the Appellate Court, the findings of the latter must be given preference in the absence of any cogent reason to the contrary.
In case of conflicting judgments of Courts below, the findings of the Appellate Court below are to be preferred and respected than that of the Trial Court unless it is shown from the record that such findings are not supported by evidence or the conclusions drawn are against the material on record or the judgment of the Appellate Court suffers from misreading or non-reading of evidence or that the reasons recorded for reversal of judgment of Trial Court are arbitrary, fanciful and perverse.
High Court in its appellate jurisdiction had to give preference to the findings of Appellate Court in case of variance and dissension in the findings of two courts below unless it suffered from grave irregularity or the same were perverse or the reasons given by the Appellate Court were not sustainable.
"Inconsistency in findings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955326
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inconsistency in findings"
2025 C L C 140
ABDUL KARIM — Petitioner Versus Mst. RUQQIA BEGUM (Deceased) through L.Rs. and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2025 P Cr
Ali Raza — Petitioner Versus Province of Sindh through Home Secretary and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2023 Y L R 1764
SARDARA and others — Petitioners Versus MANZOOR BIBI through legal heirs and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 C L C 1596
Mst. SAHIB KHATOON alias SABAN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (Deceased) through L.Rs. — Respondent
Court: Lahore2024 C L C 141
AYESHA HASHMAT KAMAL and 2 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2015 S C M R 1
AMJAD IKRAM — Appellant Versus Mst. ASIYA KAUSAR and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 C L C 553
MUHAMMAD YASIN and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD LATIF and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1953 Lahore 131
ALA‑UD‑DIN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus Mst. FARKHANDA AKHTAR‑Plaintiff‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1982 Karachi 774
Petitioners Versus QAMRUDDIN M. KHIMANI AND 4 others
Court:1985 C L C 2146
St. JOHN AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION (Pakistan) — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN RED-CROSS SOCIETY and another — Defendants
Court: Karachi