Determination of expiry period
Determination of expiry period legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
PEMRA granted cable licence to the petitioner on 15.06.2007 which expired on 15.06.2012, as it was valid for a period of five years
Petitioner illegally continued running the cable network after expiry without obtaining renewal of the licence
Petitioner, prior to expiry of the licence, had got the same up-graded
PEMRA, issued demand notices for payment of arrears and renewal of licence, and seizure order for default in payment of arrears
Petitioner challenged the legality of the seizure order and sought issuance of the certificate for the renewal of the licence on the ground that renewal expiry period had to be calculated from the date of up-gradation of the licence
Validity
Up-gradation of licence did not ipso facto extend the period of licence
Petitioner had to approach PEMRA for renewal of its licence prior to the expiry date
No document showed that the petitioner had applied for renewal of its licence before the expiry of its licence
Power of search and seizure was circumscribed by of Regln. 20(3) of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Distribution Service Operation) Regulations, 2011 which provided that a prior show cause notice before seizure of equipment had to be given
Show cause notice was admittedly given by PEMRA to the petitioner before exercise of power under Regln. 20
Petitioner, in the present case, failed to point out any violation of law, rules and regulations by PEMRA authorities
Petitioner had no equity in his favour being a defaulter of arrears and having continued with its operation without a valid licence
PEMRA was well within its rights to take action in terms of the power under Regln. 20 of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Distribution Service Operation) Regulations, 2011
High Court dismissed the petition being devoid of any merit.
"Determination of expiry period", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955398
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of expiry period"
2016 M L D 538
REGAL STAR NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2025 P T D 1532
ZAHID HUSSAIN through Attorney and another Versus NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and another
Court: Islamabad High CourtP L D 1980 Supreme Court 298
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF-Appellant Versus ABDULLAH-Respondent
Court: - S. 74-Breach of contract-Compensation - Lessee depositing a certain sum with lessor by way of security and agreeing for confiscation of such amount in case of lessee's failure to pay rent for consecutive three months-No damage alleged to have been caused to demised premises at time of expiry of lease-Provision for compensation, held, hit by S. 74, Contract Act, 1872 and lessee's deposit liable to be adjusted against rent due from him-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13.-Compensation.2011 C L C 538
AHMED — Appellant Versus Miss AISHA TARIQ — Respondent
Court: Karachi2019 S C M R 627
ABDUL LATIF and another — Appellants Versus Messrs PARMACIE PLUS — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2014 C L D 119
AHMAD DEEN — Appellant Versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. through Branch Manager — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2023 Supreme Court 359
KHAN AFSAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. QUDRAT JAN (widow) and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1999 P L C 250
Messrs JOHNSON & PHILIPS PAKISTAN LIMITED and another Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and another
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh2005 C L C 1119
Mst. MUNAWAR SULTANA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2023 C L D 554
Rana MUHAMMAD AUSAF — Appellant Versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Respondent
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)