Home Maxims & Terms Determination of expiry period meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Determination of expiry period

Determination of expiry period legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 MLD 538 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 33Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2009, Rule 12Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Distribution Service Operation) Regulations, 2011, Regln. 20Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Constitutional petitionRenewal of licence on expiry of term of licenceDetermination of expiry periodShow-cause notice before issuance of seizure order, requirement as to

PEMRA granted cable licence to the petitioner on 15.06.2007 which expired on 15.06.2012, as it was valid for a period of five years

Petitioner illegally continued running the cable network after expiry without obtaining renewal of the licence

Petitioner, prior to expiry of the licence, had got the same up-graded

PEMRA, issued demand notices for payment of arrears and renewal of licence, and seizure order for default in payment of arrears

Petitioner challenged the legality of the seizure order and sought issuance of the certificate for the renewal of the licence on the ground that renewal expiry period had to be calculated from the date of up-gradation of the licence

Validity

Up-gradation of licence did not ipso facto extend the period of licence

Petitioner had to approach PEMRA for renewal of its licence prior to the expiry date

No document showed that the petitioner had applied for renewal of its licence before the expiry of its licence

Power of search and seizure was circumscribed by of Regln. 20(3) of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Distribution Service Operation) Regulations, 2011 which provided that a prior show cause notice before seizure of equipment had to be given

Show cause notice was admittedly given by PEMRA to the petitioner before exercise of power under Regln. 20

Petitioner, in the present case, failed to point out any violation of law, rules and regulations by PEMRA authorities

Petitioner had no equity in his favour being a defaulter of arrears and having continued with its operation without a valid licence

PEMRA was well within its rights to take action in terms of the power under Regln. 20 of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Distribution Service Operation) Regulations, 2011

High Court dismissed the petition being devoid of any merit.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Determination of expiry period", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955398

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Determination of expiry period"

MLD 2016
2015-January-14

2016 M L D 538

REGAL STAR NETWORK (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2025
Writ Petition No.3910 of 2023, decided on 13th June, 2025.

2025 P T D 1532

ZAHID HUSSAIN through Attorney and another Versus NATIONAL TARIFF COMMISSION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and another

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLD 1980
Civil Appeal No. K-90 of 1978, decided on 30th August 1980.

P L D 1980 Supreme Court 298

MUHAMMAD YOUSUF-Appellant Versus ABDULLAH-Respondent

Court: - S. 74-Breach of contract-Compensation - Lessee depositing a certain sum with lessor by way of security and agreeing for confiscation of such amount in case of lessee's failure to pay rent for consecutive three months-No damage alleged to have been caused to demised premises at time of expiry of lease-Provision for compensation, held, hit by S. 74, Contract Act, 1872 and lessee's deposit liable to be adjusted against rent due from him-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13.-Compensation.
CLC 2011
2010-December-24

2011 C L C 538

AHMED — Appellant Versus Miss AISHA TARIQ — Respondent

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2019
Civil Appeal No. 25-K of 2018, decided on 25th February, 2019.

2019 S C M R 627

ABDUL LATIF and another — Appellants Versus Messrs PARMACIE PLUS — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2014
N/A

2014 C L D 119

AHMAD DEEN — Appellant Versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. through Branch Manager — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2023
2023-March-10

P L D 2023 Supreme Court 359

KHAN AFSAR — Petitioner Versus Mst. QUDRAT JAN (widow) and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC 1999
Appeals Nos. KAR-408 and KAR-409 of 1997, decided on 11th January, 1999.

1999 P L C 250

Messrs JOHNSON & PHILIPS PAKISTAN LIMITED and another Versus MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
CLC 2005
Writ Petition No.396 of 2005, heard on 13th April, 2005.

2005 C L C 1119

Mst. MUNAWAR SULTANA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2023
2022-February-22

2023 C L D 554

Rana MUHAMMAD AUSAF — Appellant Versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)