Jurisdiction of the Authority
Jurisdiction of the Authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Disputed question regarding status of employees could not be determined by the Authority; rather, for that purpose, the employees had to approach the forum concerned
Person who had served against permanent post for nine months, assumed the status of “permanent workman”; but, when the employees had admitted that on date of their retrenchment they were serving on daily wages, the Authority had travelled beyond its jurisdiction while holding the respondents as permanent workmen
Said verdict of the Authority could not be blessed with blanket of authenticity.
"Jurisdiction of the Authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955404
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Jurisdiction of the Authority"
2025 P L C 148
Messrs KIPS ACADEMY Versus ZAHID MEHMOOD and others
Court: Peshawar High Court (Abbottabad Bench)2004 S C M R 386
SARDAR SHAH and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1960 (W
SHAUKAT ALI and others‑Petitioners Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE
Court:1979 P L C 358
WAPDA THROUGH RESIDENT ENGINEER, GENERATION, NEW THERMAL POWER STATION, TANDO MOHD. KHAN Versus ASHIQ ALI AND ANOTHER
Court: VIth Labour Court Sind1978 P L C 305
AUTHORITY, LAHORE Versus COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND
Court: High Court1970 P L C 561
PAYMENT OF WAGES INSPECTOR, UJJAIN Versus SURAJMAL MEHTA AND ANOTHER
Court: Supreme Court India1996 P L C 740
ABDUL RASHID KHAN and 1565 others Versus PAKISTAN MACHINE TOOL FACTORY (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh1990 P L C 537
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS through Divisional Superintendent, Multan Versus NISEER
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab2004 P L C 54
HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER, WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, NAWABSHAH and another
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1980 Karachi 171
Before Abdul Hayee Kureshi, J Versus MONOPOLY CONTROL AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD-Respondent
Court: - Ss. 3, 6 & 7 read with S. 2(l) (k), (1), (n)-Words "trade", "trade practice" and "unreasonably restrictive trade practice"-Definition- Object of Ordinance-To achieve result of breaking monopolies or unreasonably restrictive trade practices-Powers of Authority to be exercised only in public interest and not otherwise-Manufacture of pharmaceuticals under agreements, appointing one party as distributors for entire Pakistan except city K and another party as Stockists for city of K only-Authority, on examination of agreements, taking view that some of clauses had effect of 'unreasonably preventing, restraining or lessening competition within meaning of term "unreasonably restrictive trade practice" and under S. 3 proceeding to modify territory wise rights of distribution contemplated by agreements-Such action of Authority, held, not relatable to public interest.-Words and phrases.