Home Maxims & Terms Procedural provision meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Procedural provision

Procedural provision legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 CLCN 45 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Procedural provisions

Object stated.

2016 PTD 2257 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Fiscal statuteProcedural provision

While reviewing cases relating to fiscal matters, provision concerning procedure or tax recovery mechanism provided in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, are to be strictly construed in favour of Revenue and not the subject.

2016 CLD 449 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Procedural provisionObject and scopePrincipal object of legal formalities and procedural provisions is to safeguard interest of justiceProcedural provision unless insurmountable not to be allowed to defeat ends of justice

Prescribed procedure is for the purpose of doing justice between parties and should not come in the way of doing substantial justice

Most important duty of courts of law is to do justice between the parties and in absence of any express power, normally relief to a party should not be refused on technical grounds

Civil courts being courts of both law and equity should dispose of cases on merits rather than on technical considerations.

2016 PTD 1484 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Procedural provisionScopePrinciples of strict interpretation do not extend to the machinery of procedural provisions

Such provisions are to be interpreted liberally so as to effectuate charging sections.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Procedural provision", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955408

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procedural provision"

YLR 2013
Civil Revision No.3096 of 2010, decided on 20th February, 2012.

2013 Y L R 1553

MUSHTAQ AHMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus MUMTAZ AHMAD KHAN and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1965
Income-tax Reference No. 13 of 1959, decided on 15th April 1964.

1965 P T D 178

KUDILAL GOVINDRAM SEKSARIA AND OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL),BOMBAY

Court: Bombay (India)
CLD 2016
2015-September-15

2016 C L D 449

ASKARI BANK LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus DCD SERVICES LIMITED and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
SCMR 2010
Civil Petition No.676-P of 2006, decided on 2nd March, 2010.

2010 S C M R 973

ANWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus FAZAL MANAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2019
2019-April-9

2019 C L D 1015

Messrs M. NAZIR AND COMPANY, COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS through Muhammad Nazir, FCMA — Appellant Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (CORPORATIZATION AND COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT), SECP — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLC 1979
Civil Revision No. 121 of 1974/BWP, heard on 17th February, 1979.

1979 C L C 203

FAIZ BAKHSH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus Mst. ZAKIA DILSHAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Baghdadul Jadid
CLC 1993
Civil Revision No. 1252 of 1981, heard on 21st December, 1992.

1993 C L C 555

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF SHEIKH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Messrs AEROFLOT AIR LINES, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1981
Applications ‑Nos. 3700 and 2353 of 1978 in Suit No. 214 of 1977, decided on 20th November 1978.

1981 C L C 6

MESSRS ZAMAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD.‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS ANWAR & COMPANY. KARACHI‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLCN 2017
2015-February-16

2017 C L C Note 45

AMJAD BUTT — Appellant Versus AMJAD ALI — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2013
I.C.A. No.552 of 2013, decided on 28th March, 2013.

2013 P T D 1598

WARID TELECOM Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE and others

Court: Islamabad High Court