Home Maxims & Terms Consolidated suits meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Consolidated suits

Consolidated suits legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 132 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
S. 33 & O. XX, R. 6Consolidated suitsSeparate decreesScope

Where two or more suits have been consolidated and disposed of through a common judgment, all trial court must draw up separate decree sheets with all the material particulars.

2016 PLD 409 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 33 & O. XX, R. 6Consolidated suitsSeparate decrees

No provision existed in the C.P.C. where the court was obliged to prepare separate decrees for each of the consolidated suits, however it would be more appropriate if separate decrees were drawn up

Supreme Court directed that where two or more suits had been consolidated and disposed of through a common judgment, all Trial Courts must draw up separate decree sheets with all the material particulars as per the requirements of O. XX, C.P.C.

2016 PLD 409 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 18Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.24Suits Valuation Act (VII of 1887), PreambleConsolidated suitsTrial Court passing separate decrees having different valuationAppeal againstForum

In consolidated suits wherein (separate) decrees passed had different valuations i.e. the one falling within the jurisdiction of the High Court and the other in the jurisdiction of the District Court, obviously no consolidated appeal could be filed

In such a situation the appellants were required in law to file two appeals according to the value of the original suit i.e. one before the District Judge and the other before the High Court

High Court, however, while exercising its power under S.24 of the C.P.C., if a case was made out within the purview of the said section, may, in order to avoid delay in the disposal of the matter and conflicting decisions, transfer the appeal filed before the District Judge to the High Court and decide the same along with the appeal which had been competently filed before the High Court.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Consolidated suits", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955531

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Consolidated suits"

YLR 2000
N/A

2000 Y L R 253

LTD. and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MULTAN CHEMICALS LTD. and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2014
N/A

2014 M L D 715

MICHEL MASIH and another — Petitioners Versus TAJ BHATTI and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2016
2016-February-24

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 409

ZAHID ZAMAN KHAN and others — Appellants Versus KHAN AFSAR and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Civil Revision Application Nos.4 to 6 of 1984, decided on 26th

1988 C L C 2030

Mst. SURAYA AKHTAR‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs AL‑AHRAM BUILDERS LTD.

Court: Karachi
CLC 2006
2006-January-13

2006 C L C 1390

RIASAT ALI — Applicant Versus MUHAMMAD YASEEN through Legal Heirs and another — Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1998
Writ Petition No. 1407‑F of 1996/BWP, heard on 28th April, 1997.

1998 C L C 972

GHULAM HAIDER ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT (CIVIL JUDGE IST CLASS),

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1989
Civil Petition No.577 of 1981, decided on 18th July, 1988.

1989 S C M R 1780

SIRAJ DIN and others Petitioners Versus RAJADA Respondent

Court: High Court
MLD 2022
N/A

2022 M L D 112

AMJAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus SNGPL and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2006
Writ Petition No.3998 of 2005/BWP, decided on 21st December, 2005.

2006 C L C 1185

Mst. KAUSAR JABEEN — Petitioner- Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2008
W.P. No.830 of 2000, decided on 14th April, 2008.

2008 Y L R 2267

Mst. KANEEZ FATIMA — Petitioner Versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, RAWALPINDI and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore