Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Power to promulgate Ordinance meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Power to promulgate Ordinance

Power to promulgate Ordinance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 CLC 947 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Ss. 41 & 56-C

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Shariat Court Act (IX of 1993), S.3 [as amended by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Shariat Court (Amendment) Ordinance (XVIII of 2014)]

Notification No.LD/AD-355-425/2015 dated 27.03.2015

General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S.6

Power to promulgate Ordinance

Repeal of Ordinance

Effect of repeal of Ordinance on appointments of Judges of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Shariat Court made thereunder discussed. [Minority view]

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Power to promulgate Ordinance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955945

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Power to promulgate Ordinance"

PLC 2012
Writ Petitions Nos.24691 to 24695 of 2011, decided on 13th March, 2012.

2012 P L C 219

Ch. BASHARAT ALI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Labour and Manpower Division

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2003
N/A

2003 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD QUSAIN NAQVI and another Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary Punjab, Lahore and 6 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2004
2004-April-12

P L D 2004 Karachi 532

LAL BA KHSH — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 146 of 1958, decided on 25th September 1958.

P L D 1958 (W

Mst. MOMINA KHATOON‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and another

Court:
SCMR 2018
Civil Appeals Nos. 3, 4 of 2018, 3412 of 2017 and Civil Petitions Nos.45, 64 to 70 of 2018, decided on 12th January, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1956

PAKISTAN MEDICAL AND DENTAL COUNCIL through President and 3 others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD FAHAD MALIK and 10 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJ 1973
20th April 1972

1973 P Cr

IRSHAD AHMED-Appellant Versus SARKAR-Respondent

Court: Azad J & K
PLD 1959
a determination by the Court of the question as to whether there was fresh emergency. That, however, is not a fit subject for determinations by the Court. It is very difficult to say whether the emergency has just continued or has occurred again after an interval and it could not be the intention of the Constituent Assembly that Courts should determine whether the emergency was fresh or continuing and should decide the validity of an Ordinance on this ground. If such was really the intention there would be clear words to indicate it

P L D 1959 (W

TIRATHMAL and others‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1962
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 994 of 1962, decided on 11th June 1962.

P L D 1962 (W

MASUD AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: (b) Laws (Continuance in Force) Order President's Post --Proclamation Order No. I of 1958, Art. 5 (2)‑Preamble to an Ordinance indicating that it was issued on direction of President-- Governor need not mention necessity of promulgating Ordinance --Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 102.
PLD 2021
N/A

P L D 2021 Lahore 544

VICE-CHAIRMAN PUNJAB BAR COUNCIL and others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1961
Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 1152 of 1961, decided on 31st May 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

Mian IFTIKHAR‑UD‑DIN & ARIF IFTIKHAR‑ — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents

Court: (g) Mala fide‑Allegation of, against Legislature in enacting statute‑Whether can be examined by Courts‑(Quaere)‑Security of Pakistan (Amendment) Ordinance (XIV of 1951)‑Chaudhri Qaseem‑ud‑Din v. The Province of West Pakistan P L D 1959 Lah. 76 considered.

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library