Invalid proceedings
Invalid proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Every company incorporated under Companies Ordinance, 1984, had a statutory duty to hold annual general meeting at least once in every calendar year
Rights of members included giving of a notice i.e., informing that meeting would be held and containing information or contents as prescribed in such regard, existence of quorum for a meeting, to attend the meeting, to speak and vote on a resolution in person or through a proxy
Materiality of omission or defect in a notice or irregularity in proceedings of meeting was in the context of such rights of members
Petitioner was not able to identify any defect or omission in the notice which could be treated as material and would render the meeting held on 30-4-2015 as invalid
Petitioner was not able to demonstrate that even if there was any omission or defect in the notice then either its rights were prejudiced by such omission or defect or it was prevented from effectively exercising its rights
High Court declined to interfere in the matter
Petition was dismissed in circumstances.
"Invalid proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955959
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Invalid proceedings"
1979 P Cr
ALI HUSSAIN-Applicant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Karachi1981 P L C 335
Syed MUHAMMAD AFZAL Versus MESSERS SPENCER & Co. (PAK.) LTD., KARACHI
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1971 S C M R 29
KAMIL NOOR KHAN‑Petitioner Versus CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, UNION COMMITTEE
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Karachi 471
M. M. K. A. ZAI‑Petitioner Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents
Court: High Court1988 P Cr
NIZAMUDDIN SAMEJO and others‑‑Petitioners Versus SUB‑DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1989 M L D 1487
Messers NEELKANTAN AND BROS. CONSTRUCTION — Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS,
Court: Supreme Court of India1998 M L D 1236
Haji ALI SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus REHMAT KHAN and 14 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar1996 C L C 1975
ABDUL ALEEM and 7 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus HABIBULLAH‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1979 Quetta 14
JUMA KHAN‑Appellant Versus NABI BAKHSH AND 11 others — ‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1968 Lahore 403
Mirza MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑Petitioner Versus (1) THE COLLECTOR, SHEIKHUPURA,
Court: (b) West Pakistan Local Councils (Assumption of Office) Rules, 1960---r. 7‑Member of Local Council takes seat on Local Council after taking oath of office in prescribed form‑Sub‑rules (1), (2) & (4) regarding taking of oath in prescribed manner, however, merely directory and not mandatory‑Defect in administration of oath -Does not invalidate proceeding of Council‑Basic Democracies Order P. O. No. 18 of 1959, Art. 39(4).