Home Maxims & Terms Unlawful notification meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Unlawful notification

Unlawful notification legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 PLC(CS) 629 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Deputationist, absorption ofPensionary benefitsUnlawful notification

Employee of statutory body [National Construction Limited (NCL)] not having the status of "civil servant" sent on deputation to Senate Secretariat

Notification for permanent absorption of such deputationist in Senate Secretariat issued without approval from competent authority/Chairman Senate

Such notification was unlawful and void ab initio

Further, deputationist was not entitled to pensionary benefits because deputationist's parent department (NCL) was not a pensionable organization, and thus his services in parent department (NCL) could not be counted towards his pension with respect to Senate Secretariat, and because he had also been compensated in terms of advance increments to protect him from any loss arising due to disentitlement from pensionary benefits

Case was remanded to Service Tribunal for decision afresh.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Unlawful notification", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956004

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Unlawful notification"

CLC 1996
Constitutional Petition No. D‑2711 of 1993, heard on 31st August, 1995.

1996 C L C 370

S.M. MUNIR and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 2016
Civil Petition No. 2515 of 2015, decided on 17th November, 2015.

2016 P L C (C

SENATE through Chairman Versus SHAHIQ AHMED KHAN

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2016
Civil Petition No. 2515 of 2015, decided on 17th November, 2015.

2016 S C M R 460

SENATE through Chairman — Petitioner Versus SHAHIQ AHMED KHAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2012
2012-March-19

2012 C L C 1655

GHULAM RASOOL and another — Appellants Versus SAID AHMED and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLC(CS) 2016
C.P. No.D-3913 of 2015, decided on 2nd November, 2015.

2016 P L C (C

ZUBAIR Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division and 3 others

Court: Sindh High Court
PLC(CS) 2005
Writ Petition No.5506 of 2005, decided on 3rd June, 2005.

2005 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ Versus CHANCELLOR, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE UNIVERSITY, FAISALABAD

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 2018
High Court Appeal No.170 of 2017, decided on 5th September, 2017.

2018 Y L R 1206

ARSHAD TANVEER — Appellant Versus SINDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATES (GUARANTEE) LIMITED through Managing Director and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1977
30th June 197 J

no``:

NAWAB BRar'IiERS‑Petitioners Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KAtIACHIArsDANOTHSa

Court: High Court
MLD 1995
Writ Petition No.73 of 1994, decided on 6th July, 1995.

1995 M L D 2039

Justice (Retd.) Qazi ABDUL GHAFOOR, CHAIRMAN, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR ZAKAAT COUNCIL, MUZAFFARABAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through its Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad‑‑‑Respondent .

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1976
Writ Petition No. 113 of 1975, decided on 24th February 1976.

P L D 1976 Lahore 769

Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DIRECTORATE OF LAHORE WELFARE, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: S. 5(4) read with Ss. 6 & 7‑Notification under S. 5(4) directing that barbers' and hairdressers' shops located in certain populous cities of Province shall not be exempt from operation of Ss. 6 & 7 No reasonable basis shown to exist for including chosen areas and for excluding other areas for enforcement of provisions of Ss. 6 & 7‑Held, restrictive provisions of law applied in an arbitrary, unrea sonable and discriminatory manner‑Notification declared to be unlawful and having been issued without lawful authority‑Constitu tion of Pakistan (1973), Art. 25. p. 772 8