Conditional Exemption
Conditional Exemption legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner imported 13 concrete transit mixers and his grievance was that authorities had declined benefit of Notification S.R.O. No. 1090(I)/2006, dated 01-11-2006 to him
Validity
Parties had given joint undertaking to pay amount of taxes within 3 days, in case, Federal Board of Revenue would deny exemption in excess of 5% customs duty
Petitioner, in the said undertaking, had also undertaken to accept decision of adjudicating authority by paying fine/penalty which later on came in the shape that there was no retrospective effect of Notification S.R.O. No. 1090(I)/2006, dated 01-11-2006
Petitioner was accommodated in view of such undertaking and when decision was made on the issue, petitioner was required to pay the differential amount
High Court declined to interfere in the decision made by Federal Board of Revenue
Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.
"Conditional Exemption", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956055
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conditional Exemption"
2007 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Customs, Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate TribunalP L D 2014 Lahore 72
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGINAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent
Court: High Court2014 C L D 272
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent
Court: Lahore2006 P T D 1012
Messrs DEWAN SONS and another Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 3 others
Court: Karachi High Court2002 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan1998 S C M R 1944
BAWANY METALS LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus HUB TOWN COMMITTEE and another ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 P T D 141
STAND PHARM (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman1985 S C M R 1968
PAKISTAN — Petitioner Versus Messrs ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. — Respondent
Court: High Court2014 P T D 320
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN
Court: Lahore High Court2010 P T D 287
Messrs HUFFAZ SEAMLESS PIPE IND. LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, HYDERABAD
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan