Home Maxims & Terms Conditional Exemption meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Conditional Exemption

Conditional Exemption legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 PTD 1142 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Ss. 30 & 30-ANotification S.R.O. No. 1090(I)/2006, dated 01-11-2006Conditional exemptionScope

Petitioner imported 13 concrete transit mixers and his grievance was that authorities had declined benefit of Notification S.R.O. No. 1090(I)/2006, dated 01-11-2006 to him

Validity

Parties had given joint undertaking to pay amount of taxes within 3 days, in case, Federal Board of Revenue would deny exemption in excess of 5% customs duty

Petitioner, in the said undertaking, had also undertaken to accept decision of adjudicating authority by paying fine/penalty which later on came in the shape that there was no retrospective effect of Notification S.R.O. No. 1090(I)/2006, dated 01-11-2006

Petitioner was accommodated in view of such undertaking and when decision was made on the issue, petitioner was required to pay the differential amount

High Court declined to interfere in the decision made by Federal Board of Revenue

Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Conditional Exemption", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956055

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conditional Exemption"

PTD 2007
Sales Tax Appeal No. 591 of 1998, decided on 7th June, 2005.

2007 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Customs, Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal
PLD 2014
N/A

P L D 2014 Lahore 72

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGINAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2014
N/A

2014 C L D 272

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN — Appellant Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD C/O PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PTD 2006
Constitutional Petition No. D-399 of 2002, decided on 3rd March, 2006.

2006 P T D 1012

Messrs DEWAN SONS and another Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 3 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2002
Appeal No.914/LB of 2001, decided on 12th December, 2001.

2002 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
SCMR 1998
Civil Petition for Leave o Appeal No. 669 of 1996, decided on 1st June, 1998.

1998 S C M R 1944

BAWANY METALS LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus HUB TOWN COMMITTEE and another ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2004
Complaint No.707-L of 2003, decided on 15th July, 2003.

2004 P T D 141

STAND PHARM (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
SCMR 1985
Civil Appeals Nos. 51-K and 52-K of 1973, decided on 21st January, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1968

PAKISTAN — Petitioner Versus Messrs ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. — Respondent

Court: High Court
PTD 2014
N/A

2014 P T D 320

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-II, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, MULTAN Versus Mrs. AMBREEN FAWAD CO. PAK ARAB FERTILIZERS LIMITED, MULTAN

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 2010
Civil Appeals Nos. 1576 and 1577 of 2007, decided on 1st October, 2009.

2010 P T D 287

Messrs HUFFAZ SEAMLESS PIPE IND. LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, HYDERABAD

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan