Punjab Revenue Authority
Punjab Revenue Authority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Contention of the petitioner was, inter alia, that the Punjab Revenue Authority ("Authority") had not been lawfully constituted under S. 3 of the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 and that the appointment of the Chairperson and Members of said Authority by the Provincial Government had not been done in accordance with provisions of the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 and therefore, all actions taken by the said Authority were illegal
Validity
Legal establishment of the Authority, as a corporate body, was to be done through a notification under S. 3(1) of Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 and admittedly, no such notification had been issued to date; hence the Authority had not been legally established under law
Contention of the respondents that S. 8 of Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 provided that existence of any vacancy or any defect in the constitution of the Authority did not render the acts, proceedings, decisions, orders of the Authority invalid was not tenable; since said S. 8 of Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 presupposed that the Authority had been lawfully established and constituted in the first place and the same was not a protection clause that covered for the failure of the Provincial Government to establish or constitute the Authority
No Rules or Regulations had so far been framed under Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 and the Provincial Government had not determined the manner for the appointment of the Chairperson or Members of the Authority and it was submitted on behalf of the Provincial Government that no such policy or decision to such effect existed
Chairperson and Members, in the present case, were appointed through various notifications issued by the Provincial Government and perusal of said notifications indubitably revealed that the Authority had never been established
Chairperson of the said Authority had held himself out as the Authority itself, and transacted business of the Authority and also framed various Rules, and the Provincial Government granted approval to the said Rules, knowing well that the Authority had yet not been established or constituted and the said Rules had been put up for approval only by an individual
Chairperson had also appointed all the staff and the employees of the Authority singlehandedly
No open, fair and transparent process was followed by the Provincial Government in selecting members of the Authority and in absence of Rules, appointment of Members was ultra vires the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 besides being a fraud on the statute
No provision existed in the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 for appointment of ex-offico members and therefore the same done through notifications, in the present case, was without lawful authority
Appointments of both the Chairpersons, through notifications lacked transparency, openness and a deliberative and consultative process and was at best a case of pick and choose, which reeked of official arbitrariness besides being facially discriminatory
High Court that declared failure to establish the Authority under Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 rendered all acts done by the Chairperson, purporting to be the Authority, as void ab initio and since Punjab Revenue Authority had never been established under S. 3(1) of the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012, therefore appointments of the Chairperson and Members of the same were in violation of the provisions of Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012, and hence all actions, decisions, and orders passed by the said Authority, including all Rules framed thereunder, were without lawful authority and legal force, and that all appointments of officers made under S. 39 of the Punjab Sales Tax on Services Act, 2012, by the Authority also stood vitiated
High Court observed that the Provincial Government may properly establish and constitute the Punjab Revenue Authority in terms of S. 3 of the Punjab Revenue Authority Act, 2012 and principles of law
Constitutional petitions were allowed, accordingly.
"Punjab Revenue Authority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956135
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Punjab Revenue Authority"
2019 P T D 1534
MUHAMMAD USMAN QAYYUM Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 2016 Lahore 321
INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, PAKISTAN (LAHORE CHAPTER) — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2016 P T D 1103
INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, PAKISTAN (LAHORE CHAPTER) Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court2025 P T D (Trib
Messrs COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION PAKISTAN through Authorized Representative Versus COMMISSIONER APPEALS, BALOCHISTAN REVENUE AUTHORITY and another
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal2026 P T D 542
FOUNDATION WIND ENERGY-II Versus COMMISSIONER PUNJAB REVENUE AUTHORITY and others
Court: Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench)P L D 2019 Lahore 729
NISHAT HOTEL AND PROPERTIES LIMITED and others — Petitioners Versus The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2026 P T D 645
MUHAMMAD NAEEM Versus COMMISSIONER PUNJAB REVENUE AUTHORITY and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court (Rawalpindi Bench)2017 P T D 1050
Mian MUSHTAQ AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High Court2023 P T D (Trib
Messrs GHALIB CITY Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER PRA, JARRANWALA and another
Court: Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal2021 P T D (Trib
Messrs FRIGZ FOODS SIALKOT CANTT Versus COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PRA, LAHORE
Court: Punjab Revenue Appellate Tribunal