Home Maxims & Terms Duty of trusteeship meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Duty of trusteeship

Duty of trusteeship legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 PTD 1103 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Functions ofPublic officials to act as trusteesPublic interestDuty of loyaltyDuty of trusteeshipCollective GoodScopePublic officials do not act for their own sake but rather for the sake of the public interest

Role of the public official in a democracy, like the role of the State itself, was to serve the interest of the public and its members

Government in itself had no "private" interest of its own and existed for the sake of individuals

Representatives of the Government had no "self" interest that must be protected; and they must act to achieve the collective interest

Duty of the loyalty sought to prevent the serious concern that representatives of the Government would develop their own interests and use the tremendous power granted them for purposes that did not reflect the collective good

Said duty of loyalty sought to guarantee that the government took care of the public and not itself

Duty of trusteeship imposed derivative duties upon the state and trusteeship required fairness, and fairness required integrity, relevance, equality, and reasonableness

List of principles derived from the position of trusteeship was not closed, and list of values derived from the duty of fairness was not fixed

Values and principles, by nature, were on the one hand stable and on the other hand evolving and were sown in the soul of the nation and were not subject to passing trends and as such were full of vitality, and they evolve to provide fitting solutions to new problems.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Duty of trusteeship", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956136

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duty of trusteeship"

PLD 2016
N/A

P L D 2016 Lahore 321

INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, PAKISTAN (LAHORE CHAPTER) — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1993
Civil Revision No.54 of 1993, decided on 17th July, 1993.

P L D 1993 Quetta 108

RUSTOM CAWASJI IRANI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MEHERWAN CAWASJI IRANI ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑‑ Courts while discharging judicial functions are supposed to decide matters strictly in accordance to pleadings of parties and the law available on the subject.‑‑‑Administration of justice.
PTD 2016
N/A

2016 P T D 1103

INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, PAKISTAN (LAHORE CHAPTER) Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 2014
2014-July-2

P L D 2014 Lahore 591

RAB NAWAZ DHADWANA, ADVOCATE and others — Petitioners Versus Rana MUHAMMD AKRAM, ADVOCATE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2003
2001-December-31

2003 C L C 1156

BEGUM HAFIZUNNISA QURESHI and others — Plaintiffs Versus Shaikh MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PTD 1966
The problem presented in these appeals falls to be decided on a true construction of section 41 of the Act. The material part of section 41 reads

1966 P T D 293

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus MANAGING TRUSTEES, NAGORE DURGHA

Court: Supreme Court India
PLC(CS)N 2018
N/A

2018 P L C (C

Malik SHAHZAD ELAHI Versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR

Court: Lahore High Court (Bahawalpur Bench)
PLD 2010
2010-June-10

2010 P L D Lahore 605

ATTA ULLAH KHAN MALIK — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan

Court: High Court
CLC 2020
2019-April-5

2020 C L C 785

Mrs. AFROZ SHAH and another — Appellants Versus ADVOCATE GENERAL SINDH and 11 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 2014
2013-August-21

P L D 2014 Supreme Court 47

HABIBULLAH ENERGY LIMITED and another — Appellants Versus WAPDA through Chairman and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan