Home Maxims & Terms Purposive approach meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Purposive approach

Purposive approach legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 588 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive approachMeaning and scope

While interpreting statutes, the cardinal rule is to take the purposive approach which means to look at the meaning of the words and the object and purpose of the law, which states the aim and objective of the law

Discovering the aim of the legislature carries significant weight while construing the meaning of the words of the statute.

2023 PLC(CS) 1353 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive approachMeaning and scope

While interpreting statutes, the cardinal rule is to take the purposive approach which means to look at the meaning of the words and the object and purpose of the law, which states the aim and objective of the law

Discovering the aim of the legislature carries significant weight while construing the meaning of the words of the statute.

2023 PLD 334 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Literal interpretationGolden rule of interpretationMischief rulePurposive approachScope

Statutory interpretation involves four rules, with the literal rule being the first, followed by the golden rule, the mischief rule, and finally the purposive approach

Literal rule enables the Court to interpret the legal provision in its literal and ordinary sense and it cannot examine the intent of the Legislature

Golden rule can only be given effect if the literal interpretation gives rise to some irrationality

Under such rule, the Court can look into the legislative intent of a provision or a statute

Third rule of mischief can be used to see the unconstitutionality of the legislation

Purposive rule can be set in motion for ensuring the effectiveness of the law in accordance with the will of Parliament.

2022 PLD 445 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Purposive approachScope

Statutory provisions of a statute can be interpreted liberally in a manner so that purposive approach keeping in mind the legislative intent and purpose of the statute cannot be discerned from mere recital of the Preamble because whole statue has to be read out to find out the legislative intent.

2021 SCMR 1617 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Purposive approachScopePurposive rather than a literal approach to interpretation was to be adopted while interpreting statutes

Any interpretation which advanced the purpose of the Act was to be preferred rather than an interpretation which defeated its objects.

2016 SCMR 1098 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Fiscal or taxing statutePurposive approachPurposive approach to statutory construction could be extended to tax cases

Analysis of the facts depended on such purposive construction of the statute.

2016 SCMR 1098 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Purposive approach

Modern approach to statutory construction was to have regard to the purpose of a particular provision and interpret its language, so far as possible, in the way which best gave effect to that purpose.

2016 PTD 1921 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Fiscal or taxing statutePurposive approachPurposive approach to statutory construction could be extended to tax cases

Analysis of the facts depended on such purposive construction of the statute.

2016 PTD 1921 SUPREME-COURT-OF-UK Judicial Precedent
Purposive approach

Modern approach to statutory construction was to have regard to the purpose of a particular provision and interpret its language, so far as possible, in the way which best gave effect to that purpose.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Purposive approach", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956348

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Purposive approach"

PTD 1997
I.T.A. No. 524(IB) of 1992-93, decided on 7th December, 1996.

1997 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
SCMR 2016
Civil Appeal No. 350-L of 2009, decided on 25th November, 2015.

2016 S C M R 447

DIRECTOR GENERAL, FIA and others — Appellants Versus KAMRAN IQBAL and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2015
2014-December-4

2015 M L D 995

NATIONAL SILK AND RAYON MILLS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1992
Writ Petition No. 1727 of 1989, heard on 23rd October, 1991

P L D 1992 Lahore 178

MUHAMMAD SHAFI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (Malik GUL NAWAZ),

Court: The express use of the words 'before it" in section 476‑A, Cr.P.C. seems to be a clear and unmistakable evidence of the Legislature itself in this behalf. p. 196O
PLD 2003
merits because of the change of law viz. repeal of Defence Housing Authority Lahore Ordinance, 1999 on the promulgation of Defence Housing Authority Lahore Order, 2002-- Validity---Object of Art.25(f) of the Defence Housing Authority Lahore Order, 2002, which was curative in sense and remedial in nature providing a forum, was to provide remedy to the aggrieved persons before the Executive Board and it would not be just and fair if the petitioner was deprived of the remedy---Irrationality, unreasonableness or dis proportionality resulting in injustice being a ground for judicial review, even though the case of petitioner may not be strictly falling within the ambit of Art.25(f) of the Order, High Court, had ample power and jurisdiction to relieve a party from oppression and to rectify a manifest injustice by adopting purposive approach---High Court could even remit/remand the matter in conflict to an Authority/Functionary to hear and redress the grievance of a party---Order passed by the Secretary, Cooperative of the Province rejecting the revision of the petitioner was declared by the High Court as of no legal effect, as a consequence whereof, the revision petition filed by the petitioner shall be deemed pending, which shall stand transferred to the Executive Board and shall be heard and decided in accordance with law

P L D 2003 Lahore 741

Dr. FOZIA AMBER — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2016
N/A

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 514

DILAWAR HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 1999
W.T.As. Nos.314/IB to 316/113 of 1996-97, decided on 23rd November, 1998.

1999 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
MLD 2026
2025-April-30

2026 M L D 525

Ghulam Abbas — Petitioner Versus Ex-Officio Justice of Peace and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2012
2011-November-15

2012 C L D 832

DATA STEEL PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus SUI SOUTHERN GAS CO. LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PTD 2018
I.T.R.A. No.6 of 2013, decided on 18th April, 2017.

2018 P T D 114

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-III Versus Messrs IGI INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

Court: Sindh