Home Maxims & Terms Meaning and interpretation meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Meaning and interpretation

Meaning and interpretation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 PLD 704 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 12Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 113Specific performance of agreement to sell immoveable propertyBalance sale consideration to be paid to the vendor "very soon"'Very soon'Meaning and interpretation

Term 'very soon', ordinarily meant very shortly, in matters of hours or days; it could not be stretched to a few months and certainly not years

"Very soon", in ordinary parlance, meant with utmost dispatch, as soon or as early as possible and as the circumstances would permit and would be convenient and to do what the agreement to sell required the parties to do

Such period could not be stretched to mean an indefinite period or beyond the period of three years from the date if so fixed for the specific performance of the agreement to sell

Period of over eight years, as in the present case, in paying the balance sale consideration could not be termed to be paid to the vendor "very soon"

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

2019 PLD 677 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 12Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 113Specific performance of agreement to sell immoveable propertyBalance sale consideration to be paid to the vendor "very soon"'Very soon'Meaning and interpretation

Term 'very soon', ordinarily meant very shortly, in matters of hours or days; it could not be starched to a few months and certainly not years

"Very soon", in ordinary parlance, meant with utmost dispatch, as soon or as early as possibleand as the circumstances would permit and would be convenient and to do what the agreement to sell required the parties to do

Such period could not be stretched to mean an indefinite period or beyond the period of three years from the date if so fixed for the specific performance of the agreement to sell

Period of over eight years, as in the present case, in paying the balance sale consideration could not be termed to be paid to the vendor "very soon"

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

2016 PLD 545 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 80DMinimum tax liability`Turnover from all sources' and `aggregate of declared turnover' (as used in S.80D of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979)Meaning and interpretation

Said phrases were to be necessarily read in conjunction with the explanation to S. 80D(2) of the Income Tax Ordinance of 1979 for the purposes of determination of minimum tax liability-Word 'turnover' specifically defined in S. 80D of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 could not be interpreted in a way so as to widen or enlarge the scope of the said section by interpreting `turnover' to include income from 'all sources'.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Meaning and interpretation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124956389

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Meaning and interpretation"

SCMR 1985
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 51 of 1980, decided on 27th February, 1985.

1985 S C M R 1829

MANOO GUL and others — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2009
2008-November-25

2009 C L C 905

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH MASOOD — Petitioner Versus Mst. AYSHA MAI and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2012
2011-December-26

2012 C L C 1829

JAHANGIR MOGHUL and 5 others — Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI GYMKHANA through Secretary — Defendant

Court: Sindh
MLD 2003
2003-March-11

2003 M L D 1148

MUHAMMAD AZAM — Petitioner Versus EVACUEE TRUST BOARD and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2010
C.P. No.D-2536 of 2009, decided on 9th August, 2010.

2010 P T D 2338

IQBAL HUSSAIN through Authorized Attorney Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through The Secretary, Revenue Division and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 2009
N/A

P L D 2009 Lahore 484

MUHAMMAD KALEEM ASIF — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 2011
2011-April-21

2011 C L C 1538

BURMA OIL MILLS LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI through Chairman — Defendant

Court: Karachi
CLD 2010
N/A

2010 C L D 338

M.C. B BANK, LTD., through Authorized Representative — Petitioner Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN through Governor and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2020
Civil Appeal No. 661 of 2018, decided on 13th January, 2020.

2020 P L C (C

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and others Versus ZIA-UR-REHMAN

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2020
Civil Appeal No. 661 of 2018, decided on 13th January, 2020.

2020 S C M R 436

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE and others — Appellants Versus ZIA-UR-REHMAN — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan