Commercial Licence

Works of permanent nature in the property would require prior sanction of the licensor which was missing in the present case

Agreement between the parties did not permit the plaintiff to carry out works of a permanent nature

Inventory purchased for business could not be termed as expenditure on works of permanent nature and such investment did not afford protection to a licensee from termination of a licence

Plaintiff had agreed in the said agreement that it would not be construed or interpreted in a manner as to amount to an easement

Plaintiff was estopped from submitting that he had carried out permanent works as he had not even pleaded so in his suit

Alleged agreement was not irrevocable

Plaintiff had not made out a case for the grant of an interim injunction

Revision was dismissed in circumstances.