Deficiencies in the plaint
Deficiencies in the plaint legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Provisions of O.VII, R.1, C. P. C. were procedural in nature which would not cause rejection of plaint if they were not complied with unless a party despite having been given opportunity to rectify the deficiency failed to do so or no triable issue was made out in the plaint
Plaintiff should be given an opportunity to cure the defect by supplying the omission
Failure to comply with O.VII, R.1, C.P.C would not render suit invalid
If such deficiency was not cured then court could reject the plaint
Suit filed by the plaintiff was fairly detailed and contained particulars as to the breach of contract alleged to have been committed by the defendants
Plaintiff had disclosed cause of action to institute the suit against the defendants
No prejudice had been caused to the defendants by the impugned order
If valuation of suit had been omitted from the suit then it might be permitted to be inserted by an amendment
Defendants would have a full chance to condescend to the particulars contained in the amended plaint by filing an amended written statement
Mixed questions of law and facts required evidence to resolve the said questions
Trial Court had required rectification from the plaintiff by filing an amended plaint
No jurisdictional error or infirmity had been pointed out in the impugned order passed by the Trial Court
Revision was dismissed in circumstances.
"Deficiencies in the plaint", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124957041
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deficiencies in the plaint"
2008 S C M R 37
Mst. RASOOLAN BIBI — Petitioner Versus KHIZAR HAYAT — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 C L C 1316
APEX CONSULTING PAKISTAN through Mudabbir Haneef and another — Petitioners Versus TANVEER HUSSAIN — Respondent
Court: Islamabad2008 S C M R 654
MUHAMMAD SHAFI and others — Petitioners Versus ABDUL HAMEED and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2016 C L C Note 100
MUSHTAQ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Respondent
Court: Peshawar (D.I. Khan Bench)2023 Y L R Note 83
SAEED AHMAD and 7 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD NAEEM and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)1994 M L D 308
MUD SHAFI and others — Petitioners Versus Mirza MUSHTAQ and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 C L C 524
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others — Petitioners Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Additional Collector and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2026 Supreme Court 53
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through the District Collector, Bhakkar — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD CHIRAGH and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2022 Supreme Court 716
MUHAMMAD ANWAR (decd) through L.Rs. and others — Petitioners Versus ESSA and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2023 P L C (C
RASHEED AHMED Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED through President and another
Court: Sindh High Court