Revival of proceedings
Revival of proceedings legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Arrangement, during winding up proceedings, was sanctioned between impleaded company and creditor but such arrangement was not complied with
Effect
Company Judge had jurisdiction under Ss. 284 & 285 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 not only to sanction an arrangement but also to ensure its compliance and award consequences in case of its violation
Order passed by Company Judge under deeming provision on failure of sanction arrangement was an order of winding up of the company
Jurisdiction of Company Judge to pass an order reviving winding up proceedings was provided under S.285(2) of Companies Ordinance, 1984
No cogent reasons were provided by impleaded company for non-payment of terms of settlement and for High Court to provide any further indulgence to impleaded company to continue in retaining possession of the companies
High Court revived liquidation proceedings of companies and liquidators were allowed to proceed with winding up proceedings of companies
Application was allowed accordingly.
"Revival of proceedings", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124957571
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revival of proceedings"
1994 M L D 308
MUD SHAFI and others — Petitioners Versus Mirza MUSHTAQ and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1989SCMR595
Messrs DELITE HOUSE LTD. — Petitioner Versus FAYYAZ AKBAR — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1962 Supreme Court 242
ABUL HOSSAIN SANA‑Appellant Versus SUWALAL AGARWALA AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-----Ss. 403 & 253 ---Effect of order of discharge‑Revival of proceedings not permitted without re visional of Court's order: I L R 29 Cal. 726 and I L R 28 Cal. 652 considered1996SCMR1006
SHAH MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1997 Karachi 444
ABRAR AHMED KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Court:1990 S C M R 988
Ch. MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ AHMAD CHEEMA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary, Forestry and Wildlife Department‑‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1988 C L C
Messrs DELITE HOUSE LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus FAYYAZ AKBAR‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1962 Dacca 671
MD. HASAN ALI CHOWDHURY.AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:2001CLC314
SAID MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB through
Court: Lahore1993 M L D 1437
ABDUL AZIZ — Appellant Versus YAHYA and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi