Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Contract against public policy meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Contract against public policy

Contract against public policy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2016 YLRN 132 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 23Contract against public policyRelinquishment deedScopeRelinquishment deed was prepared for return of suit property in favour of original seller of the sameValidityRelinquishment deed had not been proved to be a valid registered deedContract contrary to public policy defeating provisions of law would not be lawfulSuit property was transferred in favour of plaintiffs through registered sale-deedTransfer of suit property was intended through the impugned relinquishment deed in favour of sellerPerson could relinquish a right which was yet to be transferred in his favour

Instrument of relinquishment deed could not be used for transfer of right of a person relinquishing the right in favour of other side

Impugned relinquishment deed had no value in the eye of law

Relinquishment deed could not be used as an instrument to transfer the rights of one party in favour of other party

Findings recorded by the Courts below were against law

Impugned judgments and decrees passed by the courts below were set aide and suit of plaintiffs was decreed

Revision was allowed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Contract against public policy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958537

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Contract against public policy"

CLD 2004
N/A

2004 C L D 1213

Messrs ATLAS LEASE LTD. — Appellant Versus Messrs PUNJAB STEELS (PVT.) LTD. and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2001
2000-November-23

P L D 2001 Karachi 264

HABIB BANK LTD. — Plaintiff Versus A.B.M. GRANER (PVT.) LTD. and others — Defendants

Court: High Court
YLR 2010
N/A

2010 Y L R 1216

Mst. UMATUL MOBEEN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD AZIZ — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2004
the basis of Islamic teachings and principles---Plaintiff could not opt or contract out of such protection and the act of relinquishment by a sister was void and ineffective and her inheritance having accrued in her favour on her father's death remained intact at all the relevant times__ Since the relinquishment deed had been declared void and againSt the public policy and the same having no presumption of truth, therefore, the plaintiff had been able to establish a prima facie case in her favour-Balance of convenience was also in her favour and in case the property was transferred by the defendants to some other persons, the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss and according to the principle of lis pendens, the plaintiff had to indulge herself in complicated litigation---High Court declined to interfere with the concurrent judgments passed by two Courts below---Revision was dismissed in circumstances

2004 M L D 1699

RAB NAWAZ KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus Mst. WAZIRAN MAI and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2001
Civil Petitions Nos.436, 437 and 438 of 1999, decided on 26th February, 2001.

2001 S C M R 1053

SAMI UL HAQ — Petitioner Versus Dr. MAQBOOL HUSSAIN BUTT and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2001
2001-February-23

2001 M L D 1351

HABIB BANK — Plaintiff Versus Messrs QAYYUM SPINNING LTD. — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1970
Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 133 and 134 of 1963, decided on 3rd July 1969.

P L D 1970 Karachi 241

KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus DR. JALIL ASGHAR‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 2020
Case No. CCT 109/19, decided on 17th June, 2020.

2020 S C M R 1722

BEADICA 231 CC and 3 others — Applicants Versus TRUSTEES FOR THE TIME BEING OF THE OREGON TRUST and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Constitutional Court of South Africa*
PLD 2011
N/A

P L D 2011 Lahore 563

SAMINA KANWAL-Appellant Versus DIRECTOR PUNJAB FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FAISALABAD — Respondent

Court: High Court
CLD 2019
2019-August-1

2019 C L D 1082

ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED — Appellant Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director, Lahore — Respondent

Court: Lahore

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library