Essential pre-requisites
Essential pre-requisites legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Donor should be compos mentis, meaning thereby a person who is of sound mind and has the mental capacity to understand the legal implications of his act of making gift and he must be major and the owner of the property which is intended to be gifted; the thing gifted should be in existence at the time of hiba; the thing gifted should be such that its benefit should be lawful under the Shariat; the donor must be free from any coercion/duress or undue influence while making a gift; the thing gifted should come in the possession of the donee himself or through his representative/guardian for an effective hiba.
For a valid gift it is obligatory that the donor divests and dissociates himself downrightly from the dominion and ownership over the property of gift and puts into words his categorical intention to convey the ownership to the donee distinctly and unambiguously with delivery of possession of the property and ensure that donee has secured physical ascendency over the property in order to constitute the delivery of possession.
Principle of bona fide purchaser as enunciated by S. 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was founded upon the principles of equity
Essential ingredients of the said principle were that the transferor was the ostensible owner; that the transfer was made by express or implied consent of the real owner; that the transfer was made for consideration; and that the transferee while acting in good faith had taken reasonable care before entering into such transaction
Said four essential ingredients must co-exist in order for a person to take the benefit of the equitable principle of bona fide purchaser.
"Essential pre-requisites", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958583
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Essential pre-requisites"
2018 P L C Note 30
MATEE UL HASSAN Versus NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION APPELLATE BENCH AT ISLAMABAD and 4 others
Court: Islamabad High Court2019 M L D 107
Messrs WAHID BUILDERS AND TECHNO TIME CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE LTD. through Attorney and 4 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary SAFRON, Pak Secretariat,
Court: Peshawar2018 C L C 1354
SARDAR HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus ZAFAR HUSSAIN — Respondent
Court: Peshawar (Mingora Bench)2013 C L D 522
FARMERS' EQUITY PRIVATE LIMITED (FEP) through Chief Executive and 3 others — Appellants Versus MEHBOOB ALAM — Respondent
Court: Lahore2019 M L D 76
HASNAIN OBAID — Petitioner Versus ASIF SHAKOOR and another — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 2011 Peshawar 228
MUHAMMAD SHABBIR — Petitioner Versus SUB-REGISTRAR, PESHAWAR DISTRICT COURT, PESHAWAR and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2017 P Cr
MUHAMMAD IQBAL and 5 others — Petitioners Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)1997 P L C (C
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE Versus Mrs. KISHWAR ASLAM and others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1997 Supreme Court 578
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mrs. KISHWAR ASLAM and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D (W
ABDUS SALAM‑Petitioner Versus Kh. MEHDI ANWAR‑Respondent
Court: (b) Maxim‑Actio personalis moritur cum persona (personal actions die with the person)‑‑Does not apply in case of death of complainant in non‑cognizable case‑Complaint may be proceeded with by substituted complainant‑Muhammad Azam v. Emperor A I R 1926 Bom. 178 and Panchu Swain v. Emperor A I R 1943 Pat. 379 ref.