Home Maxims & Terms Appeal/Review meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Appeal/Review

Appeal/Review legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 SCMR 118 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Distinction between 'appeal' and 'review'

Appellate jurisdiction was always exercised by a higher court/forum/authority or a level above the court/forum/authority that adjudicated and decided the lis, whereas review jurisdiction armed the very court/forum/authority to correct its own mistake or error that crept in the order or decree and was apparent on the face of record.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Appeal/Review", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958587

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appeal/Review"

PLC(CS) 2003
Civil Petition No. 170 of 2001, decided on 3rd October, 2002.

2003 P L C (C

No. 6499 Ex-Sub-Inspector IJAZ AHMAD DAR Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RANGERS (SINDH) and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2023
Once the appeal, application of review or representation, as the case may be, of a civil servant is not decided by the departmental authority within a period of 90 days and he has elected to approach the Tribunal through preferring an appeal after lapse of that period, then his appeal has to be decided on merits and the Tribunal cannot dispose of that appeal by issuing direction to the departmental authority to decide the appeal, application for review or representation of the appellant, because the said remedy already stands exhausted by virtue of the lapse of time.

2023 P L C (C

Dr. SAYYID A. S. PIRZADA Versus The CHIEF SECRETARY, SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2023
Once the appeal, application of review or representation, as the case may be, of a civil servant is not decided by the departmental authority within a period of 90 days and he has elected to approach the Tribunal through preferring an appeal after lapse of that period, then his appeal has to be decided on merits and the Tribunal cannot dispose of that appeal by issuing direction to the departmental authority to decide the appeal, application for review or representation of the appellant, because the said remedy already stands exhausted by virtue of the lapse of time.

2023 S C M R 1087

Dr. SAYYID A. S. PIRZADA — Petitioner Versus The CHIEF SECRETARY, SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2017
2017-March-9

2017 C L D 1633

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD — Petitioner Versus JUDGE BANKING COURT and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1997
Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1996, decided on 17th December, 1996.

1997 P L C (C

SHABIR AHMED Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through its Chief Secretary, Muzaffarabad and another

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2015
Civil Appeal No.34 of 2012, decided on 7th April, 2014.

2015 P L C (C

Peer MUKARRAM-UL-HAQ Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2014
Civil Appeal No.34 of 2012, decided on 7th April, 2014.

2014 S C M R 1457

Peer MUKARRAM-UL-HAQ — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2003
2002-October-3

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 913

No. 6499 Ex-Sub-Inspector IJAZ AHMAD DAR — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RANGERS (SINDH), UNIVERSITY ROAD, KARACHI No.32 and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1979
Appeal No. 187 of 1974, decided on 11th December 1977.

1979 P L C (C

ABDUL BARI Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, SIND & HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER

Court: Service Tribunal Sind
PLC 1996
Appeal No.213 of 1993, decided on 14th March, 1996.

1996 P L C 571

MAHMOOD-UR-REHMAN Versus THE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI and another

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab