Access Promotion Contribution
Access Promotion Contribution legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners assailed clarifications dated 15-6-2015 and 22-6-2015 and demand notices issued by authorities on the basis of such clarifications
Order/notification in question was suspended for the time being and when stay was vacated it revived
In the year 2014 the directive was stayed by two different High Courts and stay orders came to an end on 24-2-2015 and the result of the same was that 2014 policy directive was revived and became operative from its original date
Effect
Clarifications issued by authorities were not sustainable and the demand based on such clarifications issued by authorities were also not tenable
Authorities issued notification dated 1-7-2014, which was in field and was suspended only for some period, therefore, authorities were estopped from demanding charges on the basis of 2013 policy directive
Clarifications dated 15-6-2015 and 22-6-2015 as well as demand notices based thereon were set aside by High Court with direction that authorities to implement notification letter dated 1-7-2014 from its date of issuance-Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Access Promotion Contribution", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124958599
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Access Promotion Contribution"
P L D 2012 Islamabad 11
Messrs DANCOM PAKISTAN (PVT.)LTD. through Chief Executive Officer — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Technology and another — Respondents
Court:2016 S C M R 475
WORLD CALL TELECOM LTD. through Chief Executive Officer and others — Appellants/Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY (PTA) through Chairman and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2009 Islamabad 41
WI-TRIBE PAKISTAN LIMITED — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary, Information Technology and Telecom, Islamabad and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2010 Lahore 260
WATEEN TELECOM (PRIVATE) LTD. — Petitioner Versus P. T. A. and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2023 M L D 323
INTERWORLD COMMUNICATION PRIVATE LIMITED through Authorized Representative — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY through Chairman, PTA and another — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2006 C L D 1068
ALFALAH SECURITIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER (SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION) SEC — Respondent
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan2017 C L C 105
LINKDOTNET TELECOM — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: Islamabad2016 Y L R 345
REDTONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. and 3 others — Plaintiffs Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary and another — Defendants
Court: Sindh2021 M L D 1642
Messrs DANCOM PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY — Respondent
Court: Islamabad2024 C L C 1206
Messrs MEERUT COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. through Honorary Secretary — Appellant Versus SHAHID AKHTAR QURESHI and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh