Home Maxims & Terms Injunctions of Islam meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Injunctions of Islam

Injunctions of Islam legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 CLC 24 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.5Nikahnama, contents ofInjunctions of Islam

Anything contained in Nikahnama which is against the spirit of Islam or the orders of Allah and Prophet (peace be upon him) cannot bind the parties even if has been made with the consent of the parties.

2022 PLC 188 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Arts.2A & 4Administration of justiceRight to appealInjunctions of IslamScopeAppeal was a statutory right of every citizenIf one felt aggrieved of any decision/verdict/dictum, he/she could appeal the same before appropriate forum

Right of appeal was recognized by the Holy Prophet (Peace be upon him) as well as by the Khulafa-e-Rashideen.

2021 MLD 1633 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss.295B, 295C & 298AConstitution of Pakistan, Arts. 2A & 31Objectionable contentsInjunctions of IslamSanctity of the Companions (Sahabah) and last-hood of the Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H)Publication/circulation on social media (facebook)Caricatures, text and picturesPublic unrest and outrage amongst Muslim majorityBlockade of certain web pages

High Court directed that Government should establish a cell under Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) including I.T. Experts and Islamic Scholars as members to keep an eye on websites and social media programs, and to take adequate steps for blockage thereof, and initiating legal proceedings, if found content objectionable, defamatory, violating any provision of law, against the beliefs of the Muslims, and against the integrity of State; that government should, for awareness of the general public, establish: firstly, an official website/portal containing authentic copy of Qur'an with translation, Ahadith books, all laws relating to Khatam-e-Nabuwat, articles written on the subject and decisions of the superior courts on this specific issue; secondly, a window/portal for answering the queries about the injunctions of Islam and Khatam-e-Nabuwat by the known Islamic scholars; and thirdly, a specific portal on the said website detailing all authentic Islamic websites/pages; that It was duty of the Authorities to initiate proceedings at their own motion without requiring complaint under Ss.5(2) and 5(3) of Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards) Rules, 2020, and Government to amend relevant laws accordingly; that proceedings on complaints lodged against offence involving Islamic Injunctions/Khatam-e-Nabuwat and Namoos-e-Sahabah, to be made available on the website/portal and updated step by step for controlling the sentiments of general public; that specific chapter be inserted in Textbooks of Urdu and Islamiyat from primary to master levels highlighting the last Prophet-hood of Hazrat Muhammad (p.b.u.h); that such website, after establishment, be advertised on media and also on notice boards of Educational and other Government institutions for maximum publicity; and that social media providers must be compelled to establish their sub offices within the country (Pakistan) so that timely interaction could be made in case if any violation of Islamic injunctions or of any Article of Constitution of Pakistan was observed/found, simultaneously enabling the institutions to lay hands on them in case they are directly or indirectly found responsible for such violation

Constitutional petition was disposed of in the said terms.

2017 PLD 12 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 203-DInjunctions of IslamScope

Injunctions of Islam refer to the Injunctions as laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Injunctions of Islam", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959123

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Injunctions of Islam"

SCMR 1989
Shariat Appeals Nos.1, 3, 4, 8, 9,10 of 1981, 21 of 1984 and 1 of 1987, decided on 10th August, 1989.

1989 S C M R 2012(2)

QAZALBASH WAQF Appellant Versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER PUNJAB, LAHORE

Court: Shariat Appellate Bench
PLD 1989
(From the judgment of Federal Shariat Court, dated 1‑10‑1979 passed in Shariat Petition No.7 of 1979).

P L D 1939 Supreme Court 633

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and another‑‑Appellants Versus GUL HASAN KHAN‑‑Respondent

Court: Shariat Appellate Bench
PLD 1992
N/A

P L D 1992 Supreme Court 153

Ministry of Financc, Islamabad — Appellant Versus Shaikh MUSHTAQ ALI, ADVOCATE — Respondent

Court: Shariat Appellate Bench
PLD 1980
16thJanuary, 1980

P L D 1980 Peshawar 154

MUMTAZ KHAN‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 7 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: (a) Constitution (Amendment) Order, 1979 P. O. 3 of 1979‑-----
PLD 1992
Shariat Petitions Nos.25/L, 32/1 of 1990, 7/ L, 14/L, 50/L, 59/1, 83/L, 86/1, to 88/L, 94/1, and 100/L of 1991, decided on 14th November, 1991.

P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 501

MUHAMMAD IQBAL CHAUDHRY, ADVOCATE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O. Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Pakistan Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 21 as amended by House Building Finance Corporation (Amendment) Ordinance (XL of 1979)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203‑DD‑‑ Repugnancy to Injunctions of Islam‑‑‑Borrowing power mentioned in S.21 has to be based on interest free transaction‑‑‑Section 21 in its present form is, therefore, repugnant to Injunctions of Islam and is to be amended accordingly.
PLD 1987
Civil Revision No. 42 of 1982, decided on 3rd December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Peshawar 24

SIDDIQUE GOHAR‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL REHMAN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1987
Writ Petition No. 1670 of 1986, decided on 21st October, 1986.

P L D 1987 Labors 58

MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE,

Court: ‑‑Art. 203‑D ‑ Object and scope of Arts. 203‑D(2) & 203‑D(3) Obligation of President/Governor to bring laws in conformity with injunctions of Islam after same having been declared to be repugnant to Islam by Shariat Court/Supreme Court Shariat Appellate Bench and effect of its non‑compliance ‑ Words "if possible" used in Government of N.‑ W. F. P. v. Malik Said Kamal Shah P L D 1986 S C 360‑Connotation of.‑Words and phrases.
PLD 2009
2008-August-28

P L D 2009 Federal Shariat Court 33

MUHAMMAD SAEEDULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1991
Constitutional Petition No.D‑803 of 1990, decided on 23rd January; 1991.

P L D 1991 Karachi 178,

and another‑‑Petitioners Versus THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary,

Court: ‑‑‑‑Sched. I as amended by Sindh Finance Act (IV of 1990) Ss 6 & 7‑‑Constitution of Pakistin (1973), Arts.227, 260(1) & 268(7)‑‑‑Term "existing law"‑Meaning‑‑‑Levy of court‑fee is against Islamic Injunctions‑‑‑Increase in court‑fee through the Sindh Finance Act, 1990, by abolishing the maximum of Rs.15,000 tnd making court‑fee payable without any upper limit would equally be unslamic‑‑‑Levy of court‑fees being un‑Islamic, increase in the quantum of court'cc, even if its burden falls only on the rich, would also be against the Injunctions )f Islam.‑Words and phrases.
SCMR 1989
Shariat Appeal No.16 of 1984, decided on 10th August, 1989.

1989 SCMR 2012(1)

SULTAN KHAN Appellant Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Secretary,

Court: Shariat Appellate Bench