Prequalification
Prequalification legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Guidelines On Evaluation of Similar Bio-therapeutic Products (SBP's) Standards" issued by the World Health Organization (WHO)
Nexus of WHO Guidelines and the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012
Petitioners, who were drug manufacturers and distributors, impugned the rejection of their prequalification bids, on a tender for procurement of a drug issued by the Provincial Government
Petitioners were deemed not prequalified due to the fact that certain clauses of the pre-qualification document, required bio-equivalence/bio-similarity studies according to the prescribed guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO), which the petitioners could not provide
Question before the High Court was whether the terms and conditions of said clauses of the bidding document stifled free competition and the terms of Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012
Held, Regulatory authorities all over the world had outlined robust data requirements to demonstrate bio-similarity of drugs and bio-similar manufacturers would need to generate data from lab-testing, and non-clinical testing to show that the bio-similar drug they had developed would provide the same therapeutic benefits and risks to patients as the reference bio-therapeutic product
Petitioners, in the present case, were required to conduct bio-similarity study along the WHO Guidelines
Perusal of the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 revealed that the same had adopted standards/protocols prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in its guidelines for licensing of bio-similar drugs and after its promulgation, all applications for seeking authorization for manufacturing and marketing of bio-similar drugs, were required to be done on basis of said WHO Guidelines , and thus said guidelines had a statutory force
Stringent regulatory framework had been provided by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012, by adopting the WHO Guidelines, to ensure the health and safety of the public and the petitioners had not obtained the requisite certificate from the prescribed laboratories
Provincial Government, in the present case, was within its rights to demand and lay down the conditions in the tender for bio-similarity studies which were consistent with and conformed to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 and the larger public interest outweighed the narrow commercial interest of the petitioners
Inclusion of impugned clauses in the pre-qualification document, therefore, did not offend the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012
Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.
"Prequalification", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959162
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prequalification"
2013 C L C 476
PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Secretary and another — Appellants Versus SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs. Zeeshan Fatima and others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 2012 Sindh 434
Messrs SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs.Zeeshan Fatima — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator — Defendant
Court: High Court2012 C L D 1445
Messrs SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs. Zeeshan Fatima — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator — Defendant
Court: SindhP L D 2018 Sindh 303
SINOTEC CO. LIMITED through Authorized Person — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Sindh and 5 others — Defendants
Court: High Court2022 C L C 364
KHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Partner/Attorney — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE through Secretary HUD and PHED Government of the Punjab, Lahore and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2022 C L C 781
ABDUL GHANI KHETRAN and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation Department and another — Respondents
Court: BalochistanP L D 2024 Balochistan 38
M. N. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Authorized Officer/Attorney — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and 10 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2018 S C M R 365
PREMIER BATTERY INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED — Petitioner Versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1993 Lahore 26
and 3 others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB,
Court:P L D 2017 Lahore 124
Messrs ALFALAH MEDICOS through Sole Proprietor and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Primary and Secondary Healthcare and 4 others — Respondents
Court: High Court