Home Maxims & Terms Prequalification meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Prequalification

Prequalification legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 124 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 32, 4 , 2(v) & Sched. 1Drugs (Licensing, Registering and Advertising) Rules 1976, R. 29Public ProcurementPrequalificationProcurement of medicines/ drugsBio-similarity/bio-equivalence of drugs

"Guidelines On Evaluation of Similar Bio-therapeutic Products (SBP's) Standards" issued by the World Health Organization (WHO)

Nexus of WHO Guidelines and the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012

Petitioners, who were drug manufacturers and distributors, impugned the rejection of their prequalification bids, on a tender for procurement of a drug issued by the Provincial Government

Petitioners were deemed not prequalified due to the fact that certain clauses of the pre-qualification document, required bio-equivalence/bio-similarity studies according to the prescribed guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO), which the petitioners could not provide

Question before the High Court was whether the terms and conditions of said clauses of the bidding document stifled free competition and the terms of Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012

Held, Regulatory authorities all over the world had outlined robust data requirements to demonstrate bio-similarity of drugs and bio-similar manufacturers would need to generate data from lab-testing, and non-clinical testing to show that the bio-similar drug they had developed would provide the same therapeutic benefits and risks to patients as the reference bio-therapeutic product

Petitioners, in the present case, were required to conduct bio-similarity study along the WHO Guidelines

Perusal of the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 revealed that the same had adopted standards/protocols prescribed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in its guidelines for licensing of bio-similar drugs and after its promulgation, all applications for seeking authorization for manufacturing and marketing of bio-similar drugs, were required to be done on basis of said WHO Guidelines , and thus said guidelines had a statutory force

Stringent regulatory framework had been provided by the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012, by adopting the WHO Guidelines, to ensure the health and safety of the public and the petitioners had not obtained the requisite certificate from the prescribed laboratories

Provincial Government, in the present case, was within its rights to demand and lay down the conditions in the tender for bio-similarity studies which were consistent with and conformed to the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012 and the larger public interest outweighed the narrow commercial interest of the petitioners

Inclusion of impugned clauses in the pre-qualification document, therefore, did not offend the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan Act, 2012

Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Prequalification", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959162

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prequalification"

CLC 2013
2012-October-3

2013 C L C 476

PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Secretary and another — Appellants Versus SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs. Zeeshan Fatima and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 2012
2012-January-30

P L D 2012 Sindh 434

Messrs SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs.Zeeshan Fatima — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator — Defendant

Court: High Court
CLD 2012
2012-January-30

2012 C L D 1445

Messrs SHAHEEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Mrs. Zeeshan Fatima — Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator — Defendant

Court: Sindh
PLD 2018
2017-September-15

P L D 2018 Sindh 303

SINOTEC CO. LIMITED through Authorized Person — Plaintiff Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Sindh and 5 others — Defendants

Court: High Court
CLC 2022
N/A

2022 C L C 364

KHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Partner/Attorney — Petitioner Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE through Secretary HUD and PHED Government of the Punjab, Lahore and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2022
2021-September-30

2022 C L C 781

ABDUL GHANI KHETRAN and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Irrigation Department and another — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
PLD 2024
2023-May-29

P L D 2024 Balochistan 38

M. N. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Authorized Officer/Attorney — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta and 10 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 2018
Civil Petition No. 481-K of 2017, decided on 7th December, 2017.

2018 S C M R 365

PREMIER BATTERY INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED — Petitioner Versus KARACHI WATER AND SEWERAGE BOARD and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1993
Writ Petition No‑7899 of 1992, decided on 2nd September, 1992

P L D 1993 Lahore 26

and 3 others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB,

Court:
PLD 2017
N/A

P L D 2017 Lahore 124

Messrs ALFALAH MEDICOS through Sole Proprietor and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Primary and Secondary Healthcare and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court