Death by negligence
Death by negligence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners sought recovery of compensation for deaths and damages caused by accidental air strike by an aircraft of Pakistan Air Force
Validity
Death certificates and medical reports of all injured were available on file and were not touched by anyone which affirmed the stance of petitioners and it went un-rebutted
When deaths/injuries/collateral damages were established on record, then by keeping in view guaranteed Constitutional and Fundamental Rights, legal heirs of all deceased, as per available record, who suffered injuries and collateral damage of their houses were entitled for compensation
High Court directed Federal Government to pay compensation amount to true legal heirs of each deceased, injured and for damages caused due to the incident
Constitutional petition was allowed in circumstances.
"Death by negligence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959182
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Death by negligence"
1984 P Cr
Raja S. AKHTAR and another — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1988 P C r
KALA KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Peshawar1984 S C M R 943
SALIMUDDIN‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 304, 304‑A & 337‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 438 & 439‑Causing death by negligence or rash and negligent driving ‑Revision‑Reference‑Enhancement of sentence‑Trial Court convicting and sentencing accused to R. I under Ss. 304‑A & 337 --Appeal filed by accused dismissed‑Additional Sessions Judge on revision by complainant making reference to High Court under S. 438, Cr. P. C. for considering "imposition of fine of granting compensation to dependents of deceased"‑High Court ordering suo motu notice for enhancement of sentence but on contrary converting offence from S. 304‑A/337 to S. 304, Penal Code‑Held, sending case back to High Court for considering question of enhancement of sentence not proper at late stage after nearly twenty years‑Judgment passed by High Court set aside and that of trial Court restored.‑Sentence.1989 P Cr
Court: Lahore
1984 P Cr
MUSTAQ AHMAD — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1999 C L C 1225
Mst. SULTANA BIBI and another‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION
Court: Karachi1984 P Cr
MUHAMMAD HAROON-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Karachi1989 P Cr
THE STATE‑‑Appellant Versus NAWAB KHAN Respondent
Court: Peshawar1992 M L D 262
MUSHTAO AHMAD ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1977 Lahore 222
MUHAMMAD HAYAT‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: S. 304, Part I‑Culpable homicide not amounting to murder Sentence‑Evidence not clear as to what actually led accused to attack deceased‑Deceased alleged to have cut dirty jokes but nature of such jokes not given‑Not unsafe to presume that such dirty jokes must have caused extreme annoyance to accused resulting in loss of self‑control, attack being sudden‑Accused, however, dealing only one knife blow to deceased‑Sentence of ten years' R. I, reduced to seven years' R. I., in circumstances of case.‑ Culpable homicide not amounting to murder‑Sentence.