Summons on corporation
Summons on corporation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Service on corporation under O.XXIX, R. 2 of C.P.C. could only be effected on the Secretary or any other Director or other principal officer of the corporation or by sending it vide post to the corporation at its registered office
Suit in the present case was filed against the bank, through the Manager of a local branch, however, the Banking Company was not impleaded through its Head Office in the original suit and the service had been effected on the clerk of the local branch of the Bank
Process was thus not duly served in accordance with the mandatory provisions of O.XXIX, R.2, C.P.C.
Ex parte decree, in circumstances, was to be set aside under O.IX, R.13 of the C.P.C.
Appeal was allowed.
Service on corporation under O.XXIX, R. 2 of C.P.C. could only be effected on the Secretary or any other Director or other principal officer of the corporation or by sending it vide post to the corporation at its registered office
Suit in the present case was filed against the bank, through the Manager of a local branch, however, the Banking Company was not impleaded through its Head Office in the original suit and the service had been effected on the clerk of the local branch of the Bank
Process was thus not duly served in accordance with the mandatory provisions of O.XXIX, R.2, C.P.C.
Ex parte decree, in circumstances, was to be set aside under O.IX, R.13 of the C.P.C.
Appeal was allowed.
"Summons on corporation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959191
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Summons on corporation"
2017 C L D 255
ASKARI BANK LTD. through Branch Manager — Appellant Versus Messrs BUKHARI TRAVELS, MIRPUR through Manager — Respondent
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2017 C L C 225
ASKARI BANK LTD. through Branch Manager — Appellant Versus Messrs BUKHARI TRAVELS, MIRPUR through Manager — Respondent
Court: High Court (AJ&K)1992 C L C 563
STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petition Versus NASIM‑E‑SAHAR through Legal Heirs ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1984 M L D 208
ANFORDS (PAKISTAN) LIMITED — Appellant Versus DENTOGENE LABORATORIES LIMITED — Respondent
Court: Karachi2000 C L C 835
ZIA‑UD-DIN and 7 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus JAMEELA AKHTAR and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1987 C L C 2164
PAKISTAN INSURANCE CORPORATION ‑‑Appellant Versus GRINDLAYS BANK LTD. and 3 others‑ ‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2019 C L D 285
DEUTSCHE BANK AG — Plaintiff Versus FATEH TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED — Defendant
Court: Sindh2001 C L C 1065
Managing Director and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus JAMAIL AKHTAR NASEEB, TEXTILE CONSULTANT,
Court: Lahore2015 M L D 1269
TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Plaintiff Versus NAVEED HASAN SHAH — Defendant
Court: SindhP L D 1972 Peshawar 133
MUHAMMAD SAMIN JAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MESSRS FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LTD., NOWSHERA AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: