Home Maxims & Terms Priority meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Priority

Priority legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLC(CS) 242 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Candidate for direct recruitment and a candidate claiming promotionPriority

If a candidate for direct recruitment and a candidate claiming promotion to a particular job simultaneously had contested for the job then the candidate claiming promotion should be given priority.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Priority", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959382

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Priority"

MLD 2011
2011-January-26

2011 M L D 1360

UMESH KUMAR — Petitioner Versus Engineer BASANT LAL GULSHAN and 9 others — Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Balochistan
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeals Nos. 97‑K and 98‑K of 1989, decided on 13th January, 1993.

1994 S C M R 2248

M/s. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus M/s. MAIDA LIMITED and ethers‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1989
Admiralty Suit No. 311 of 1984, decided on. 4th July, 1988.

1989 M L D 1615

HADI DASTBAZ, SIND CLUB‑‑Plaintiff Versus m. v. RICE TRADER and another — ‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLC 1982
Suit No. 464 of 1976, decided on 23rd December, 1981,

1982 P L C 316

HABIB BANK LTD. KARACHI Versus SIND EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Court: High Court
CLC 2006
2005-August-9

2006 C L C 415

STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN — Petitioner Versus HUSSAIN MUMTAZ — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLD 2002
Ex. 123 of 1999, decided on 29th November, 2001.

2002 C L D 696

UNITED BANK LTD. ‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs SHAIKH RAYON SILK MILLS LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1982
Admiralty Suit No. 294 of 1978, decided on 28th September, 1981.

P L D 1982 Karachi 749

TWAHA‑Plaintiff Versus THE MASTER m. v. `ASIAN QUEEN' AND 2 OTHERS‑Defendants

Court: ‑‑Courts of Admiralty (Pakistan) Act (XVI of 1891), S. 2 and Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance (XLII of 1980), S. 3 Admiralty suit‑Decree against ship‑Execution‑Priorities‑Just and proper in absence of rules to follow rules laid down by British Courts until rules framed under Ordinance XLII of 1980‑Alternatively in absence of such rules or any law, Court to follow rules of justice, equity and good conscience‑Examination of question of priority in light of British practice appearing to be in consonance with rules of justice, equity and good conscience‑Decrees, held, to be satisfied in order of priority thus : firstly decrees on account of wages, secondly decree on account of Masters' wages and disbursement if any, thirdly decree on mortgages, fourthly necessaries and repairs and lastly ordinary decrees.‑Decree.
PTD 1965
Civil Appeal No. 824 of 1963, decided on 30th November 1964.

1965 P T D 564

BUILDERS SUPPLY CORPORATION Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court India
PLC(CS) 2003
N/A

2003 P L C (C

Dr. KHALIL-UR-REHMAN BHATTI Versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1960
Civil Revision No. 513 of 1955, decided on 2nd September 1958.

1960 P T D 139

ASSOCIATED PICTURES LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA and others

Court: Calcutta (India)