Home Maxims & Terms Efficacious remedy meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Efficacious remedy

Efficacious remedy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLC(CS) 250 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 15(3) & 43Punjab University Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Statutes, 1975, Paras. 12, 15 & 17University employeeProbationerUnsatisfactory performanceTermination of serviceNon-statutory service rulesShow cause notice, issuance ofRegular inquiryEfficacious remedy

Petitioner-employee was appointed as Senior Medical Officer (Dental) in BS-18 in the University but during probation his service was dispensed with due to unsatisfactory performance

Contention of petitioner-employee was that Syndicate being the competent authority, no adverse order could be passed without its recommendation

Validity

Where nature of the rules governing terms and conditions of service of an employee were non-statutory, constitutional petition against order of Authority was barred

Rules/regulations governing terms and conditions of service of the employee of University were non-statutory

Action taken by the authority could not be considered as arbitrary, capricious or fanciful for exercise of constitutional jurisdiction in the present case

Authority which had power to appoint anybody enjoyed the power to proceed against an appointee under the relevant provisions of law

When services of probationer were terminated on the basis of poor performance then he was not entitled for any show cause notice

No show cause notice was required to be issued prior to proceedings against the petitioner-employee

Employee would acquire certain rights only after successful completion of probation period

Not only remedy of appeal or review but that of revision had also been catered for an aggrieved employee of the University

When remedy of appeal, review or revision had been provided then no one could be allowed to by-pass the same simply for the reason that same was not efficacious

Constitutional petition being not maintainable was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Efficacious remedy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959383

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Efficacious remedy"

PTD 1999
Civil Writ Petition No. 1698 of 1997, decided on 17th July, 1997

1999 P T D 2754

MOHAL CHAND BHARDWAJ Versus UNION OF INDIA and others

Court: 228I T R 590
YLR 1999
Writ Petition No. 10221 of 1998, decided on 25th November, 1998.

1999 Y L R 432

RAZA MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COUNCIL, MUZAFFARGARH through Administrator and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2012
2012-March-21

2012 M L D 1202

NISAR AHMAD SIDDIQUI — Petitioner Versus CANTONMENT BOARD — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLC 2001
Writ Petition No. 136 of 1998/BWP, decided on 9th February, 2000.

2001 P L C 176

RIAZ AHMAD MALIK Versus ADMINISTRATOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR and others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLD 2006
2005-April-8

2006 C L D 528

GHULAM MUSTAFA BUGHIO and another — Petitioners Versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.4, KARACHI and another-Respondents

Court: Karachi
YLR 2015
Civil Appeal No.205 of 2013, decided on 12th June, 2014.

2015 Y L R 1728

TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY — Appellant Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary, AJ&K and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
YLR 2020
I.C.A. No. 100 of 2018 in Writ Petition No. 220 of 2018, decided on 16th January, 2020.

2020 Y L R 1222

ARSHAD IQBAL — Appellant Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HOUSING FOUNDATION through Director General through Director General — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PCRLJ 2000
Writ Petition No.26627 of 1998, decided on 19th February, 1999.

2000 P Cr

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2008
2008-September-12

2008 C L D 1324

MUHAMMAD AAMIR SAEED — Petitioner Versus Messrs UNITED BANK LTD. through President and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2005
2005-May-20

2005 P Cr

ASMA JAHANGIR, CHAIRPERSON HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Petitioner Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (OPERATIONS), LAHORE and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore