Home Maxims & Terms Exclusion of monopolies meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Exclusion of monopolies

Exclusion of monopolies legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 CLD 194 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Preamble & Chap. II [Ss. 3 to 11]Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance (XIII of 2002), S. 23Exclusion of monopoliesProhibition of abuse of dominant position, certain agreements, deceptive marketing practices and approval of mergersSpecial and general lawScopeCompetition Act, 2010, is a special law when it comes to matters of competition

Although S. 23 of Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, does provide some guidance on the exclusion of monopolies but the Competition Act, 2010, is a special law on this matter as the violations such as abuse of dominant position, prohibited agreements, approval and non-approval of mergers and acquisitions and deceptive marketing practices are covered in detail under the Act to ensure consumer welfare and a free and open market to all competitors

Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, contains no provisions which envisage or provide for an enforcement mechanism to remedy anti-competitive practices

Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002, appears to be a special law when it comes to the regulation of, inter alia, licensed activities

For alleged anti-competitive practices, Competition Act, 2010, is the special law for all such purposes and the Commission has the power to take cognizance of such matters.

2017 PLD 289 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 23(2) & PreambleExclusion of monopoliesMedia ownership concentration and exclusion of monopoliesVertical and horizontal integration of media ownershipNature of such vertical and horizontal integrationRationale for regulation of "vertical integration" of mediaAny enterprise or owner who operated publication, distribution or broadcast was a media enterprise

Media enterprise could own more than one company engaged in the media business which would include a group of companies which were engaged in different areas of the media sector

Within electronic media, a media enterprise engaged in broadcast, distribution or publication and could operate another media enterprise engaged in the same line of work being broadcast, distribution or publication which was horizontal integration

Horizontal integration could give rise to oligopoly and in extreme cases monopoly, hence such integration was regulated by capping the number of licences a media enterprise could own in the same medium being broadcast, distribution or publication

Vertical integration, on the other hand, was caused when one media enterprise integrated within the electronic media to operate some other media enterprise, so a broadcaster would integrate to operate distribution services or publication or publication would integrate to operate broadcast media

Vertical integration included cross-ownership, that was, when a common entity would operate broadcast media as well as distribution service

Vertical integration was of concern for Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) because if a smaller group of owners controlled a large share of the market through broadcast and distribution it would cause concentration of ownership, which in turn meant reduction in diversity and plurality of content and the free flow of information.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Exclusion of monopolies", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959406

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Exclusion of monopolies"

CLD 2012
2012-January-19

2012 C L D 1436

ZAFAR IQBAL PROPRIETOR UNIVERSAL CABLE NETWORK, DASKA KALAN — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA), ISLAMABAD through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2018
Civil Appeals Nos. 700 to 703 of 2017 and Civil Misc. Application No.1407 of 2018, decided on 8th May, 2018.

2018 S C M R 1807

MAG ENTERTAINMENT (PVT.) LTD. and others — Appellants Versus INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2011
2011-May-18

PLD 2011 Karachi 494

INDEPENDENT MUSIC GROUP, SMC (PVT) LTD. and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior, Islamabad

Court: High Court
PLD 2017
either of two grounds, one involving a constitutional question, the other a question of statutory construction or general law, the Court would decide only the latter---Where a statute was susceptible of two constructions, by one of which grave and doubtful constitutional questions arose and by the other of which such questions were avoided, the Court's duty was to adopt the latter

P L D 2017 Lahore 289

INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORATION (PVT) LTD and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2011
2011-June-6

P L D 2011 Supreme Court 805

INDEPENDENT MUSIC GROUP SMC (PVT.) LTD and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2025
2023-December-14

P L D 2025 Sindh 69

SOUTHERN NETWORK LIMITED through Chief Executive — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Information Islamabad and 3 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2022
2021-December-1

2022 C L D 194

File No. 223/Media/C&TA/CCP/2018

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
CLC 1992
Writ Petition No. 64 of 1992, decided on 9th July, 1992.

1992 C L C 2148

MUHAMMAD ASLAM and 5 others ‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus MAYOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MUZAFFARABAD

Court: Azad J & K
CLD 2019
2018-September-5

2019 C L D 562

Messrs ISMAIL INDUSTRIES LIMITED through Authorized Officer — Plaintiff Versus MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL through Director, Partner, Owner and 2 others — Defendants

Court: Sindh
CLD 2010
(File No.03/SEC-3/CCP/08), decided on 24th April, 2009.

2010 C L D 641

MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LTD. Versus SIZA FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan