Home Maxims & Terms Constitutional mandate meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Constitutional mandate

Constitutional mandate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 243 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 18 & 24Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S.54Constitution of Pakistan, Art.10ArrestStagesLiberty of citizenConstitutional mandate

Arrest of accused required under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, can be made at three different stages in terms of proceedings: First stage is that if after receipt of any information as provided under S.18(b) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, Chairman NAB forms an opinion that reasonable complaint has been made or credible information has been received or reasonable suspicion exists that accused is involved in case cognizable under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, then he may arrest accused person, provided that there is some inquiry or investigation, duly authorized by competent authority is pending against accused under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, second stage of arrest is provided under S.18(e) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, where, Chairman NAB can make arrest of accused if conditions as mentioned in S.54, Cr.P.C. are fulfilled or if investigating officer conducting such inquiry or investigation requests for permission to arrest accused, then he can grant such permission of arrest of accused, however after examining grounds/reasons and incriminating material produced by investigating officer which may justify such permission of arrest and third stage is visualized under S.24(a) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, under which, if accused is neither arrested by Chairman NAB initially nor as provided under S.18(e) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, then Chairman NAB can direct that such accused person may be arrested, however before making arrest or issuing warrants of arrest or awarding permission to any investigating officer to arrest accused, Chairman NAB is required under law to first satisfy himself as to whether there is any tangible evidence or incriminating material available against accused connecting him with alleged offence cognizable under National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, and the conditions as detailed in S.54, Cr.P.C. are fulfilled

If Chairman NAB forms an opinion on the material placed before him, only then he can make arrest or permit investigating officer to make arrest of accused, otherwise an accused cannot be arrested on the basis of mere allegations or suspicion, in absence of sufficient incriminating material or evidence available with NAB authorities

Authority vested in Chairman NAB, to arrest accused at any stage of inquiry and investigation is neither absolute nor gives Chairman NAB unfettered powers to deprive a citizen of his inviolable right to liberty, which is to be safeguarded jealously, keeping in view the constitutional mandate under Art.10 of the Constitution.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Constitutional mandate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959411

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Constitutional mandate"

PCRLJ 2013
2012-November-5

2013 P Cr

SADAQAT ALI — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, GUJRANWALA and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1990
Civil Appeals Nos. 105‑K, 106‑K and 107‑K of 1989, decided on 9th October, 1989.

1990 SCMR 91

GOVERNMENT OF SIND and another‑‑Appellants Versus SHARAF FARIDI and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeal No.221 of 1991, decided on 14th October, 1992.

1993 S C M R 582

WAPDA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ZAHOOR AHMED — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2026
2025-October-28

2026 C L C 743

MIR BIJAR CHAKAR DOMKI — Petitioner Versus The CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTN, QUETTA and others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan (Sibi Bench)
PLC(CS) 1995
Writ Petition No. 4074 of 1994, decided on 11th April, 1994.

1995 P L C (C

Dr. Mrs. ZAHIDA IFTIKHAR Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1993
Writ Petition ~No. 1566 of 1993, decided on 14th February, 1993.

1993 C L C 1020

AURANGZEB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MASSAN and 13 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2014
2014-March-19

P L D 2014 Supreme Court 463

ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1995
Criminal Original No.34 of 1994, decided on 4th January, 1995.

P L D 1995 Lahore 147

THE STATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus EDITOR, PRINTER, PUBLISHER AND PROPRIETOR

Court:
PLC(CS) 1997
C.P. No. D‑1761, D‑1841 and D‑1875 of 1995, decided on 2nd October, 1996.

1997 P L C (C

ANISUL REHMAN and 12 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary, Excise and Taxation, Karachi and 5 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLC(CS) 1993
Civil Appeal No.221 of 1991, decided on 14th October, 1992.

1993 P L C (C

WAPDA Versus ZAHOOR AHMED

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan