Home Maxims & Terms Contract of bailment meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Contract of bailment

Contract of bailment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PLD 276 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 148 & 150Suit for recovery of money and damagesBailor and baileeRelationshipContract of bailment

Plaintiff corporation handed over stocks of rice to defendant company and the same were accepted by defendant on the basis of 'Book Balance'

Plaintiff alleged that defendant company failed to exercise all care in respect of stocks and sought recovery of cost of deficient stocks and damages

Validity

To constitute effective bailment contract, it was obligatory on the part of bailor to put bailee in possession of the goods

Actual tender and delivery of goods and acceptance thereof by bailee must be there, and must be actual and physical transfer of possession

Merely putting into possession of documents of title did not constitute bailment of goods

Contact was awarded to defendant on 'Book Balance' basis without any physical verification of stock of rice which was lying in godown in dumped position

Such stock could not be assumed that a proper account could be made without physical verification of stock, which was not done, despite various requests and letters by defendant

In the grain handling contract there was inherent risk of diminishing quantity and quality of food grains and ratio of the losses was inversely proportionate to the nature of storage, which could vary from case to case basis

Longer the duration, greater the quantum of losses

Crops in question were related to year 1988-89, handling contract of which was earlier awarded to some other persons and on their failure the left over stocks were entrusted to the defendant through subject contract

Stock in question was lying in the godown of plaintiff in a dumped condition for a considerable period of time

Every possibility existed that stocks in question had diminished quantity and quality due to infestations and other factors

Defendant apprehending such facts informed plaintiff at the very outset of the contract but plaintiff did not pay any heed and took no step to safeguard the stocks to mitigate the losses

Suit was dismissed in circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Contract of bailment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959414

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Contract of bailment"

CLD 2025
2024-May-20

2025 C L D 1183

MAHMOODA TAPAL and another — Appellants Versus STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LTD. and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1971
Appeal from Original Decree No. 50 of 1961, decided on 17th April 1970.

P L D 1971 Dacca 139

PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus MESSRS ADAMJEE JUTE MILLS LTD‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2004
2003-December-23

P L D 2004 Karachi 407

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT) LTD. SHAHRAH-E-FAISAL, KARACHI — Plaintiff Versus MURSHED ENTERPRISES and 2 others — Defendants

Court: High Court
CLC 2016
2016-April-1

2016 C L C 1573

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN — Plaintiff Versus MUHAMMAD ALAM — Defendant

Court: Sindh
CLD 2016
2016-April-1

2016 C L D 2106

TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN — Plaintiff Versus MUHAMMAD ALAM — Defendant

Court: Sindh
PTD 2006
N/A

2006 P T D 1459

Messrs AMIE INVESTMENT (PVT.) LTD. through Director Versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR-II and 4 others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLD 2022
2021-October-26

2022 C L D 320

VITAL CHEMICALS CORPORATION and 2 others — Appellants Versus SILK BANK LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
CLD 2020
2020-January-9

2020 C L D 796

HABIB METROPOLITAN BANK LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus NAZIR RICE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer and others — Defendants

Court: Lahore
PTD 1998
Civil Appeals Nos.7077 and 7078 of 1993, 1646 of 1994, 1692 and 1693 of 1998, decided on 20th March, 1998.

1998 P T D 3669

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SHAAN FINANCE (PVT) LTD.

Court: 231 I T R 308
PTD 1999
R. C. Nos. 13, 22 and 101 of 1988, decided on 5th August, 1996.

1999 P T D 746

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus A. P. PAPER MILLS

Court: 225 I T R 262