Home Maxims & Terms Depreciation allowance meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Depreciation allowance

Depreciation allowance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 PTD 1158 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 23 & Third Sched. Entry I & IIHospital buildingDepreciation allowance"Factory" or "workshop"Scope

Deprecation allowance allowed for buildings was 5% [Entry I of Third Sched. to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979], whereas for "factory" or "workshop" it was 10% [Entry II of Third Sched. to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979]

Question was whether a hospital could be considered as a "factory" or "workshop", entitling it to 10% depreciation allowance

Hospital whilst being an enclosed structure was undoubtedly a building, however, by no stretch of imagination could it be considered to fall within the definition of a "factory" or "workshop" as it was not a building where goods were manufactured, repaired or assembled

Hospital was, thus, only entitled to depreciation allowance at the general rate of 5% instead of 10%

Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed accordingly.

2017 PLD 134 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 23 & Third Sched. Entry I & IIHospital buildingDepreciation allowance"Factory" or "workshop"Scope

Deprecation allowance allowed for buildings was 5% [Entry I of Third Sched. to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979], whereas for "factory" or "workshop" it was 10% [Entry II of Third Sched. to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979]

Question was whether a hospital could be considered as a "factory" or "workshop", entitling it to 10% depreciation allowance

Hospital whilst being an enclosed structure was undoubtedly a building, however, by no stretch of imagination could it be considered to fall within the definition of a "factory" or "workshop" as it was not a building where goods were manufactured, repaired or assembled

Hospital was, thus, only entitled to depreciation allowance at the general rate of 5% instead of 10%

Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed accordingly.

2017 PTD 768 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Third Sched. Rr. 5A, 5B & 5CDepreciation allowanceAssociation of Persons (AOP)

Whether the term 'industrial undertaking' as used in Rr. 5A, 5B & 5C of the Third Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 included an Association of Persons (AOP)

Rule 5B of the Third Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was applicable to industrial undertakings; R. 5C of the Schedule, applied to only those industrial undertakings as referred to in R. 5A

Rule 5A of the Schedule was applicable only to the industrial undertakings owned and managed by a company

Association of Persons(AOP) being not a limited company, therefore, it was not entitled to the benefit of R.5C of the Third Schedule of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Depreciation allowance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124959519

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Depreciation allowance"

PTD 1997
Civil Appeal No.4167 of 1994, decided on 8th November, 1996.

1997 P T D 1386

EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 223 I T R 1
PTD 1996
I.T.A. No. 648(IB) of 1992-93, decided on 12th February, 1996.

1996 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2001
Income-tax Reference No. 108 of 1993, decided on 8th July, 1999

2001 P T D 3776

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus J.K. INDUSTRIES LTD.

Court: 241 I T R 537
PTD 1988
I.T.As. Nos. 117/LB to 122/LB of 1986-87, 569/LB and 570/LB of 1981-82, decided on 26th June, 1988.

1988 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 2017
2017-February-2

P L D 2017 Supreme Court 134

Messrs SHIFA INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL, ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: (b) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979) since repealed-
PTD 2002
Tax Case No. 269 of 1988 (Reference No. 202 of 1988), decided on 15th June, 1998.

2002 P T D 1659

COVELONG BEACH HOTEL (INDIA) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 242 I T R 512
PTD 1993
I.TA. No.343/KB of 1992-93, decided on 14th June, 1993.

1993 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2007
I.T.C. No.1077 of 1999, decided on 16th December, 2006.

2007 P T D 1436

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus LEVER BROTHERS LTD.

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1998
Civil Appeals Nos.3179 to 3181 of 1982, decided on 9th July, 1997.

1998 P T D 950

SOUTH INDIA VISCOSE LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 227 I T R 286
PTD 1999
Case Referred No.22 of 1987, decided on 9th August, 1996,

1999 P T D 2676

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus ANDHRA COTTON MILLS LTD.

Court: 228I T R 30