Conditional compromise

Husband objected to warrant contending that "once compromise was always a compromise" therefore his warrants should be cancelled

Circumstances demonstrated that decree was not satisfied in letter and spirit, rather parties entered into a compromise on conditional statement of wife i.e. that if husband again deserted her from his house, she reserved the right to re-file execution petition

Judgment-debtor being father of minors and husband of the lady was under legal and moral obligation to maintain them

Judgment and decree was not assailed before appellate court, therefore, it had attained finality and no exception could be taken to that

Executing court could not go beyond the decree

Contention of judgment-debtor that "once compromise was always a compromise" was misconceived and ill-founded because compromise inter se parties was conditional which was revoked by husband/father himself

Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly.