Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Procedure of court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Procedure of court

Procedure of court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2017 CLC 1032 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Procedure of court

Where a party asked the court to adopt a specific procedure for determination of a lis pending before it, such party could not be allowed to use any deviation from the normal procedure by saying that it was detrimental to the rights of such party.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Procedure of court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124960447

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Procedure of court"

PLD 1982
Shariat Appeal No. K‑3 of 1980, decided on 17th May, 1981.

P L D 1982 Supreme Court 20

WASI AHMED RIZVI‑Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ Art. 203‑B as introduced by Constitution (Amendment) Order, 1979 P. O. 3 of 1979, Art. 21‑Repugnance to Injunctions of Islam‑Prin ciples of res judicata and aches‑Held, relate to procedure of Court ‑Such principles even if treated as usage having force of law, challenge to them barred due to their being concerned with procedure of Court and procedural law being expressly excluded from definition of law itself.
PLD 1958
Suit No. 1303.of 1955, decided on 31st July 1957.

P L D 1958 (W

Ch. ABDUL RAUF and another‑Plaintiffs Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED AKHTAR and others

Court:
PLD 1957
Privy Council Appeal No. 12 of 1956, decided on 11th December 1956, from the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa.

P L D 1957 Privy Council 151

ALFRED GRANVILLE ROSS‑Appellant Versus THE QUEEN‑Respondent

Court: (b) Re‑trial‑------Appellate Court's power to order‑Regarded as part of "practice and procedure" of Court (Kenya case) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 423.
PCRLJ 1971
6th November 1970

1971 P Cr

NAZABAT‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1978
Civil Miscellaneous No. 1088 of 1972, decided on 15th March 1973.

P L D 1978 Lahore 711

KHAN ASADULLAB KHAN AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus Sheikh ISLAMUD DIN-Respondent

Court: --Art. 102-Constitution of Pakistan. (1973), Art. 205-Power of supervision and control conferred by Arts. 102 of 1962 Constitution and 205 of 1972 Constitution-Inclines power to interfere in appropriate cases even with judicial orders inter porter-Power of supervision and control-To be exercised for correcting errors of jurisdiction in particular.-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 102.
CLC 2013
2012-April-25

2013 C L C 1091

BARKAT ALI and another — Petitioners Versus SULTAN MEHMOOD and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2008
merits---Procedural law, no doubt, plays a vital role in handling and streamlining the matters in a proper and disciplined way, same, however should not prevail upon the justice---Litigants come to the court for getting justice and not for learning the court procedure or discipline---Courts no doubt should be strict in fallowing the procedure as well as maintaining the discipline, but not at the cost of' justice---Foremost and primary duty of the court was to dispense justice based on facts, law and on the principle of equity---Petitioner having not been heard by the Appellate Court on merits of the case, impugned orders were set aside and case was remanded to Appellate Court to head the Advocates of both sides and decide matter on merits within specified period in order to avoid further delay

2008 M L D 939

Malik ZAHID ATTIQUE through Attorney — Petitioner Versus FARHANA AMJAD and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1981
Shariat Petition No. 18 of 1979, decided on 1st October, 1979.

P L D 1981 Peshawar 46

Maulvi BILAL HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW‑Respondent

Court: Shariat Bench
PLD 1951
Privy Council Appeal No. 53 of 1950, decided on 28th February, 1951, from Ceylon.

P L D 1951 Privy Council 23

ARTHUR REGINALD PERERA-Appellant Versus THE KING-Respondent

Court:
CLC 1996
Constitutional Petition No. 5.108 of 1994, decided on 29th January, 1996.

1996 C L C 1372

MUHAMMAD ARIFUDDIN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. MUJEEBUNNISSA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library