Inquiry by Magistrate
Inquiry by Magistrate legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Provision of S. 145, Cr.P.C. does not concern with an inquiry relating to ownership or right to possess; it is concerned to the extent of determining as to which party was in possession at certain relevant times
Inquiry under S. 145(4), Cr.P.C. is confined to determining as to which party was in possession on the date of preliminary order passed under S. 145(1), Cr.P.C.
Scope of Ss. 174 & 176, Cr.P.C. was limited to ascertainment of cause of death without recording a finding regarding guilt or innocence of accused.
Magistrate could hold an enquiry into the cause of death of a person if it had taken place, while the deceased was in police custody
Such enquiry could be either instead of or in addition to the investigation held by a police officer under S. 174, Cr.P.C.
"Inquiry by Magistrate", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124960468
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Inquiry by Magistrate"
2022 Y L R Note 188
ANWAR HUSSAIN — Applicant Versus IXTH ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DISTRICT WEST and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2022 P Cr
Mst. KANEEZ FATIMA — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 P Cr
ALTAF HUSSAIN SHAH Petitioner Versus KHALIQ DAD KHAN and another Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 P Cr
KHALID MASOOD, SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, WAPDA-Petitioner Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER-Respondent
Court: Lahore2021 Y L R 654
MAHBOOB AHMED KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 14 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)P L D 1989 Supreme Court 519
MUHAMMAD AZIM MALIK‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Ss. 8 & 9‑‑Inquiry by Magistrate‑‑Receipt of evidence‑‑Appraisal of evidence means the evaluation of the admissible and incriminating material mostly the positive knowledge/statements‑‑Ignorance of facts of the case or absence of suspicion cannot be considered as evidence of innocence of a person facing a trial‑‑When an evidence remains unrebutted then it is sufficient to establish a prima facie case to justify trial of detenu.‑‑ Evidence.P L D 1956 (P
THE CROWN‑Petitioner Versus KHUDA BUX and others‑Respondents
Court:2016 P Cr
Mst. YASMEEN SHAIKH — Petitioner Versus AYAZ PATHAN and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2010 Y L R 2536
MUHAMMAD YUSUF — Petitioner Versus Malik KHIZAR HAYAT KHAN and 6 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2021 P Cr
MUHAMMAD OWAIS — Petitioner Versus AAWAL KHAN and another — Respondents
Court: Balochistan