Production and admission of documents
Production and admission of documents legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Mere production of an admissible document by itself was not sufficient to take the same as proved, rather contents thereof were to be provided in the manner required by law.
No prudent mind could believe that for execution of an important material document, parties would make a passerby a witness, who admits in cross-examination that parties were not known to him prior to execution of such document for which he was called by some unknown counsel / advocate
Such admission by witness to document would result in failure in proving such document.
Although production of a document and admission of a document were two different subjects, a document could be produced in evidence which was always subject to admission as required under Art. 78 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984
Courts were vested with jurisdiction to ascertain genuineness and authenticity of any document in order to arrive at a just and fair conclusion on the touchstone and parameters of Art. 78 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 and when a document had been exhibited in evidence without any objection by the opposite party, the same was deemed to be proven in all respects
Objection as to the authenticity of a document was to be taken at an earlier stage and after a document was admitted in evidence, an objection against admission could not be allowed at any subsequent stage.
"Production and admission of documents", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124960625
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Production and admission of documents"
2018 C L D 226
AURANGZEB — Appellant Versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION through Chairman and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2017 M L D 1369
NAEEM TUFAIL — Appellant Versus JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2017 C L D 1122
NAEEM TUFAIL — Appellant Versus JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2021 C L C 1537
MUHAMMAD ASGHAR — Appellant Versus Mst. TAHIRA PARVEEN and others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1953 Lahore 308
PUNJAB PROVINCE‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL AHMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:2021 S C M R 1844
ASIM MURTAZA KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Chairman NAB, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2023 M L D 44
Dr. Agha AIJAZ ALI PATHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Sindh2002 S C M R 468
ABDUL HAMID MIAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KASURI‑‑‑Respondent's
Court: Supreme of PakistanP L D 2022 Sindh 222
MUHAMMAD YOUNUS ARAIN and others — Petitioners Versus STATE through D.G. NAB and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2020 C L C 1927
Messrs S.R.T. ASSOCIATES through Proprietor — Petitioner Versus The DIRECTOR GENERAL FRONTIER WORKS ORGANIZATION, RAWALPINDI and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh