Home Maxims & Terms Production and admission of documents meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Production and admission of documents

Production and admission of documents legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 CLC 1537 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Art.79, 81 & 76Production and admission of documents

Mere production of an admissible document by itself was not sufficient to take the same as proved, rather contents thereof were to be provided in the manner required by law.

2021 CLC 1537 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Arts.78, 79 & 72Documentary evidence, proof ofProduction and admission of documentsMaterial witnesses to execution of documentsScope

No prudent mind could believe that for execution of an important material document, parties would make a passerby a witness, who admits in cross-examination that parties were not known to him prior to execution of such document for which he was called by some unknown counsel / advocate

Such admission by witness to document would result in failure in proving such document.

2017 MLD 1369 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 78, 79 & 72Documentary evidence, proof ofProduction and admission of documentsObjection against admission of a documentScope

Although production of a document and admission of a document were two different subjects, a document could be produced in evidence which was always subject to admission as required under Art. 78 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984

Courts were vested with jurisdiction to ascertain genuineness and authenticity of any document in order to arrive at a just and fair conclusion on the touchstone and parameters of Art. 78 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 and when a document had been exhibited in evidence without any objection by the opposite party, the same was deemed to be proven in all respects

Objection as to the authenticity of a document was to be taken at an earlier stage and after a document was admitted in evidence, an objection against admission could not be allowed at any subsequent stage.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Production and admission of documents", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124960625

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Production and admission of documents"

CLD 2018
N/A

2018 C L D 226

AURANGZEB — Appellant Versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2017
N/A

2017 M L D 1369

NAEEM TUFAIL — Appellant Versus JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2017
N/A

2017 C L D 1122

NAEEM TUFAIL — Appellant Versus JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2021
2021-January-26

2021 C L C 1537

MUHAMMAD ASGHAR — Appellant Versus Mst. TAHIRA PARVEEN and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 1953
(This case was referred to the above noted Division Bench by M. R. Kayani, J. vide His Lordship's order dated the 18th December. 1950).

P L D 1953 Lahore 308

PUNJAB PROVINCE‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL AHMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 2021
Civil Petition No. 4878 of 2021, decided on 6th September, 2021.

2021 S C M R 1844

ASIM MURTAZA KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Chairman NAB, Islamabad — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2023
2021-May-20

2023 M L D 44

Dr. Agha AIJAZ ALI PATHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh
SCMR 2002
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.186‑L of 1999, decided on 26th, May, 2000.

2002 S C M R 468

ABDUL HAMID MIAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ KASURI‑‑‑Respondent's

Court: Supreme of Pakistan
PLD 2022
preponderance of probability and all that was necessary in a civil case was to show that proof adduced in support of a fact was such that it could make a prudent mind act upon it---In criminal case, prosecution had to prove guilt of an accused beyond a reasonable doubt, and his conviction could be recorded by Court only when it was satisfied that possibility of his innocence, on the basis of evidence adduced against him was completely ruled out---High Court declined to interfere in production of photostat copies of record during trial---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances

P L D 2022 Sindh 222

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS ARAIN and others — Petitioners Versus STATE through D.G. NAB and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2020
2020-February-28

2020 C L C 1927

Messrs S.R.T. ASSOCIATES through Proprietor — Petitioner Versus The DIRECTOR GENERAL FRONTIER WORKS ORGANIZATION, RAWALPINDI and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh